Dr. D.C. Wadhwa & Ors. vs. State of Bihar & Ors. case of 1986

-
 The Dr. D.C. Wadhwa & Ors. vs. State of Bihar & Ors. case of 1986 is a cornerstone in the Indian judicial history, highlighting the delicate balance of power between the executive and legislative branches of government . The case stemmed from a practice that had become routine for the Bihar government: the re-promulgation of ordinances without legislative approval, a process that Dr. D.C. Wadhwa, an economics professor, found to be a subversion of democratic principles . The Supreme Court's decision in this case was a resounding affirmation of constitutional law and its supremacy over executive convenience. By declaring the practice of re-promulgating ordinances without legislative consent as unconstitutional, the court reinforced the necessity of legislative scrutiny and the impermanence of ordinances, which are meant to be emergency measures, not a backdoor for enacting laws. This landmark judgment serves as a reminder of the importance of checks and balances within
Post a Comment

The digital web

-
This topic is known by everyone but nobody even tries to talk or have a conversation on it.
Why this is so I don't even understand, today we live in the 21st century but we the mindset of the 70s and 80s.
Many people have some issues regarding their mental health. "Mental Health" by using this word please don't take me wrong. Because many people think that mental health is something that is connected to madness or the unsound mind. this is the problem of our generation. They take everything lightly. If they are feeling depressed they don't even let you know about that because they think about others what other people will say about them. People don't talk much about their problems and due to that they face problems of extra thinking, sometimes it happens they get angry at others without any reasons, sometimes even a normal sound like sneezing or chewing food sounds makes them angry. They started feeling low or might have a misunderstanding about their family members that nobody cares for him, nobody loves him, and due to all these clumsy thoughts he starts making some distance between him and his family members. Due to this digital age, we all are trapped in the web of the internet, social media, and the gaming world. It is just a matter of laugh that we live in one home under one roof but then also we say good morning on WhatsApp, the home we never even utter a word for our family members, but at Facebook and Twitter, we post open letters for our dear ones. And because of all these things we get upset and happy at the same time just like Schrodinger's cat. So my point is that instead of saying the emotionless good morning on WhatsApp say good morning in real that will create a new and fresh bond between you and your dear ones.
And you know if you talk about how you are feeling? Why you get angry without any reason, share what you are going through then all your problems regarding your mental health will get vanished.
Smile like a Fountain, 
stand on your words,
like a mountain,
Raise your voice for truth,
Like an ocean and
Keep your feet on the ground,
Just like a fruitful tree standing 
On his roots.
With these words, I'll take a leave.
I hope you all will start thinking about your mental health and start living a healthy life from now.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

šŸŒŸPrivilege CommitteešŸŒŸ

-
šŸ“ŒAbout Committee of Privileges: ✍️It is a Standing Committee. ✍️ It came into being on 7 January 2013 as one half of the replacements for the Committee on Standards and Privileges. ✍️The functions of this committee are "Semi-judicial"  ✍️ Aimed to examine cases if breach of priviledges of the House and it's mrmbers and recommends appropriate action. šŸ“ŒMembers in Rajya Sabha - 10, nominated by Chairman . šŸ“Œ Members in Lok-Sabha - 15  nominated by the Speaker . ✍️In the Rajya Sabha, the deputy chairperson heads the committee of privileges. šŸŒŸPowers and Functions: ✍️The committee examines every question involving a breach of privilege of the House or of the members or of any Committee thereof referred to it by the House or by the Speaker/Chairman.  ✍️It also determines with reference to the facts of each case whether a breach of privilege is involved and makes suitable recommendations in its report. ✍️In Rajya - Sabha When a question of privilege is referred to the Committe
Read more

‘India had parliamentary institutions when people of Europe were mere nomads’

-
Image
The quote by  Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, "India had parliamentary institutions when people of Europe were mere nomads,"  is a powerful testament to the ancient civilization's early advancements in governance and societal structures. It speaks volumes about the historical context of India's political systems, which were far more developed than often recognized in the common Eurocentric narrative of history. This essay will delve into the implications of Ambedkar's statement, exploring its historical accuracy, its significance in the context of Indian pride and identity, and its relevance in contemporary discussions about the origins and evolution of democratic institutions. Firstly, various historical records and scholarly research support the assertion that India had parliamentary institutions in ancient times. The 'sabha' and 'samiti' of the Vedic period, for instance, are indicative of consultative assemblies that played a role in governance. These bodie
Read more

Dr. D.C. Wadhwa & Ors. vs. State of Bihar & Ors. case of 1986

-
 The Dr. D.C. Wadhwa & Ors. vs. State of Bihar & Ors. case of 1986 is a cornerstone in the Indian judicial history, highlighting the delicate balance of power between the executive and legislative branches of government . The case stemmed from a practice that had become routine for the Bihar government: the re-promulgation of ordinances without legislative approval, a process that Dr. D.C. Wadhwa, an economics professor, found to be a subversion of democratic principles . The Supreme Court's decision in this case was a resounding affirmation of constitutional law and its supremacy over executive convenience. By declaring the practice of re-promulgating ordinances without legislative consent as unconstitutional, the court reinforced the necessity of legislative scrutiny and the impermanence of ordinances, which are meant to be emergency measures, not a backdoor for enacting laws. This landmark judgment serves as a reminder of the importance of checks and balances within
Read more