The Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA)

The Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) , introduced in 2005 by the Ministry of Rural Development , is one of the world's largest work guarantee programs.  It aims to strengthen livelihood security in rural areas by providing 100 days of assured wage employment each year to adult members of rural households willing to engage in unskilled manual labor. This initiative plays a vital role in promoting economic stability, empowering communities, and fostering sustainable development across India's rural landscape. The Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) stands as a monumental testament to India's commitment to social welfare and rural empowerment. Enacted in 2005, this groundbreaking initiative has evolved into one of the most significant pillars of support for rural populations across the country. Imagine a program that guarantees 100 days of wage employment annually to adult members of rural households—this is not jus...

Sabarimala Temple in Kerala

 The Sabarimala Temple in Kerala, India, has been at the center of a contentious legal battle regarding women’s entry. Here’s a summary of the key events:

  1. 2018 Verdict:

  2. Controversy and Protests:

    • The verdict led to massive protests in Kerala.
    • Women who attempted to enter the shrine faced resistance, with some being assaulted or turned away.
    • The temple’s historical ban on women was based on the belief that menstruating women were considered “unclean.”
  3. Recent Development (2019):

  4. Current Situation:

    • While women can still legally enter the temple, it remains a contentious issue.
    • The fight for equality before the gods continues, as the case will be reopened by a larger seven-judge bench.

What  were the Arguments For Women’s Entry?

  1. Equality and Fundamental Rights:

    • Advocates argue that women have the same constitutional right to worship as men. Denying them entry based on gender violates their fundamental rights under Article 25 of the Indian Constitution.
    • Equality before the gods should prevail, irrespective of biological factors.
  2. Modernization and Progress:

    • Society has evolved, and discriminatory practices should not persist. Allowing women’s entry reflects a progressive outlook.
    • The 2018 Supreme Court verdict emphasized this perspective.
  3. Breaking Stereotypes:

    • Allowing women of all ages to enter the temple challenges traditional stereotypes about menstruation and purity.
    • It promotes a more inclusive and open-minded society.

Arguments Against Women’s Entry:

  1. Religious Tradition and Custom:

    • Opponents argue that the temple’s historical practice of excluding women is deeply rooted in tradition.
    • They believe that the deity, Lord Ayyappa, is celibate and that women of reproductive age should not disturb his meditation.
  2. Preserving Sanctity and Rituals:

    • Some devotees believe that allowing women would disrupt the temple’s sanctity and rituals.
    • The temple’s unique practices, including the 41-day penance (vratham), are considered essential for spiritual purity.
  3. Respecting Devotees’ Sentiments:

    • Devotees who adhere to the existing practice feel emotionally connected to it.
    • They argue that their sentiments and faith should be respected, even if it means maintaining gender-based restrictions.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is the Sanctity of Parliamentary Debate, Which Lies at the Core of Democratic Decision-Making, Being Compromised?

‘India had parliamentary institutions when people of Europe were mere nomads’

The Jogimara and Sitabenga Caves