Comparative Analysis of Past Delimitation Exercises & Their Impact on Governance

-
Image
                          Comparative Analysis  Delimitation is the process of redrawing the boundaries of electoral constituencies to ensure fair representation based on population changes . In India, it is conducted by the Delimitation Commission , an independent body established under Article 82 (for Lok Sabha) and Article 170 (for State Assemblies) after every Census . Key Objectives of Delimitation ✔ Equal Representation – Ensures constituencies have uniform voter strength , preventing overrepresentation or underrepresentation.  ✔ Electoral Integrity – Adjusts boundaries to reflect demographic shifts , maintaining fair political representation .  ✔ Reservation Adjustments – Determines SC/ST reserved seats based on population distribution. Historical Timeline of Delimitation in India 📌 1952 – First delimitation based on the  1951 Census .  📌 1963 – Adjustments after state reorga...
Post a Comment

Sabarimala Temple in Kerala

-

 The Sabarimala Temple in Kerala, India, has been at the center of a contentious legal battle regarding women’s entry. Here’s a summary of the key events:

  1. 2018 Verdict:

  2. Controversy and Protests:

    • The verdict led to massive protests in Kerala.
    • Women who attempted to enter the shrine faced resistance, with some being assaulted or turned away.
    • The temple’s historical ban on women was based on the belief that menstruating women were considered “unclean.”

  3. Recent Development (2019):

  4. Current Situation:

    • While women can still legally enter the temple, it remains a contentious issue.
    • The fight for equality before the gods continues, as the case will be reopened by a larger seven-judge bench.

What  were the Arguments For Women’s Entry?

  1. Equality and Fundamental Rights:

    • Advocates argue that women have the same constitutional right to worship as men. Denying them entry based on gender violates their fundamental rights under Article 25 of the Indian Constitution.
    • Equality before the gods should prevail, irrespective of biological factors.

  2. Modernization and Progress:

    • Society has evolved, and discriminatory practices should not persist. Allowing women’s entry reflects a progressive outlook.
    • The 2018 Supreme Court verdict emphasized this perspective.

  3. Breaking Stereotypes:

    • Allowing women of all ages to enter the temple challenges traditional stereotypes about menstruation and purity.
    • It promotes a more inclusive and open-minded society.

Arguments Against Women’s Entry:

  1. Religious Tradition and Custom:

    • Opponents argue that the temple’s historical practice of excluding women is deeply rooted in tradition.
    • They believe that the deity, Lord Ayyappa, is celibate and that women of reproductive age should not disturb his meditation.

  2. Preserving Sanctity and Rituals:

    • Some devotees believe that allowing women would disrupt the temple’s sanctity and rituals.
    • The temple’s unique practices, including the 41-day penance (vratham), are considered essential for spiritual purity.

  3. Respecting Devotees’ Sentiments:

    • Devotees who adhere to the existing practice feel emotionally connected to it.
    • They argue that their sentiments and faith should be respected, even if it means maintaining gender-based restrictions.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is the Sanctity of Parliamentary Debate, Which Lies at the Core of Democratic Decision-Making, Being Compromised?

-
From the historical view where the core of parliamentary debates was based on public welfare, the utilitarianism principle where every individual was very much aware of being responsible for his/her words towards the public, their actions and reactions were under the basic rule. The decorum of parliament was maintained and the politicians were public servants thinking of a collective decision where the core value was to take a step in the public welfare way. Thinking of that era when like-minded people were making decisions for a common vision that was devoted to a well-developed nation as a whole. But if we talk about today's debates they sound to be senseless.   Fighting with the elders, breaking public property, unethical slogans, and quotations to put-down the individual's public and private image is not at all the act of the responsible member of parliament. The core value is dying with the baseless debates where logical thinking and analytical norms are missing. There wa...
Read more

‘India had parliamentary institutions when people of Europe were mere nomads’

-
Image
The quote by  Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, "India had parliamentary institutions when people of Europe were mere nomads,"  is a powerful testament to the ancient civilization's early advancements in governance and societal structures. It speaks volumes about the historical context of India's political systems, which were far more developed than often recognized in the common Eurocentric narrative of history. This essay will delve into the implications of Ambedkar's statement, exploring its historical accuracy, its significance in the context of Indian pride and identity, and its relevance in contemporary discussions about the origins and evolution of democratic institutions. Firstly, various historical records and scholarly research support the assertion that India had parliamentary institutions in ancient times. The 'sabha' and 'samiti' of the Vedic period, for instance, are indicative of consultative assemblies that played a role in governance. These bodie...
Read more

Navigating the Complexities of Cross-Border Insolvency

-
Image
Cross-border , or international insolvency, refers to scenarios where a financially distressed debtor has assets and creditors spread across various jurisdictions . This predominantly concerns multinational corporations rather than individual bankruptcies, presenting unique challenges and considerations. The Jet Airways Case Study A prominent example of cross-border insolvency is the Jet Airways case. The airline found itself entangled in insolvency proceedings in both India and the Netherlands. Initially, the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) in India declared the Dutch proceedings void. However, a cooperation protocol was later established, identifying the Indian proceedings as the main proceedings and the Dutch proceedings as non-main proceedings. This case underscores the intricacies and judicial diplomacy required in cross-border insolvency matters. Key Challenges Jurisdictional Issues : Identifying the primary jurisdiction's court over insolvency proceedings remains a com...
Read more