What is life?

-
What is life ? is it a seesaw of life and death or happiness and sorrows, many times when I see people running behind success in today's new generation meaning of success name, fame and money. every day when I wake up I think that today will be my best day, I will achieve something new but at the evening I get to know that nothing is going to change, it is same as it was the day before evening... so, how we can be happy? Full of life, enjoy life. It's only the bookish language that feels life, enjoy life, don't get affected by anyone but in reality we are getting affected, we suddenly react with any action taken place in front of us. It's our mind that forces us to react, loud when you get angry. These emotions can't be stopped because this is life. This is a bitter truth that no can be fully satisfied ,if a person  is saying  that he or she is fully satisfied  then he or she is wrong  because  if get fully satisfied  then there will be nothing to do with this life and you  will stop growing because  if a person is fully satisfied  then he will not  want to grow more, invent more, live more. So feel satisfied with a little bit but not fully satisfied because this is life little bit of twist and turns are important for us to become strength full, powerfull so that we can face this world with full capacity. So keep that hunger in you because that hunger will help you out to grow more, discover big, love fully and give the best of the things which you were expecting in your life. So this was my way of thinking what's yours. ..let me know. Till then goodnight.. achieve big and keep your hunger alive for your wants.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is the Sanctity of Parliamentary Debate, Which Lies at the Core of Democratic Decision-Making, Being Compromised?

-
From the historical view where the core of parliamentary debates was based on public welfare, the utilitarianism principle where every individual was very much aware of being responsible for his/her words towards the public, their actions and reactions were under the basic rule. The decorum of parliament was maintained and the politicians were public servants thinking of a collective decision where the core value was to take a step in the public welfare way. Thinking of that era when like-minded people were making decisions for a common vision that was devoted to a well-developed nation as a whole. But if we talk about today's debates they sound to be senseless.   Fighting with the elders, breaking public property, unethical slogans, and quotations to put-down the individual's public and private image is not at all the act of the responsible member of parliament. The core value is dying with the baseless debates where logical thinking and analytical norms are missing. There wa...
Read more

‘India had parliamentary institutions when people of Europe were mere nomads’

-
Image
The quote by  Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, "India had parliamentary institutions when people of Europe were mere nomads,"  is a powerful testament to the ancient civilization's early advancements in governance and societal structures. It speaks volumes about the historical context of India's political systems, which were far more developed than often recognized in the common Eurocentric narrative of history. This essay will delve into the implications of Ambedkar's statement, exploring its historical accuracy, its significance in the context of Indian pride and identity, and its relevance in contemporary discussions about the origins and evolution of democratic institutions. Firstly, various historical records and scholarly research support the assertion that India had parliamentary institutions in ancient times. The 'sabha' and 'samiti' of the Vedic period, for instance, are indicative of consultative assemblies that played a role in governance. These bodie...
Read more

Dr. D.C. Wadhwa & Ors. vs. State of Bihar & Ors. case of 1986

-
 The Dr. D.C. Wadhwa & Ors. vs. State of Bihar & Ors. case of 1986 is a cornerstone in the Indian judicial history, highlighting the delicate balance of power between the executive and legislative branches of government . The case stemmed from a practice that had become routine for the Bihar government: the re-promulgation of ordinances without legislative approval, a process that Dr. D.C. Wadhwa, an economics professor, found to be a subversion of democratic principles . The Supreme Court's decision in this case was a resounding affirmation of constitutional law and its supremacy over executive convenience. By declaring the practice of re-promulgating ordinances without legislative consent as unconstitutional, the court reinforced the necessity of legislative scrutiny and the impermanence of ordinances, which are meant to be emergency measures, not a backdoor for enacting laws. This landmark judgment serves as a reminder of the importance of checks and balances within ...
Read more