Dr. D.C. Wadhwa & Ors. vs. State of Bihar & Ors. case of 1986

-
 The Dr. D.C. Wadhwa & Ors. vs. State of Bihar & Ors. case of 1986 is a cornerstone in the Indian judicial history, highlighting the delicate balance of power between the executive and legislative branches of government . The case stemmed from a practice that had become routine for the Bihar government: the re-promulgation of ordinances without legislative approval, a process that Dr. D.C. Wadhwa, an economics professor, found to be a subversion of democratic principles . The Supreme Court's decision in this case was a resounding affirmation of constitutional law and its supremacy over executive convenience. By declaring the practice of re-promulgating ordinances without legislative consent as unconstitutional, the court reinforced the necessity of legislative scrutiny and the impermanence of ordinances, which are meant to be emergency measures, not a backdoor for enacting laws. This landmark judgment serves as a reminder of the importance of checks and balances within
Post a Comment

life me kabhi kabhi break bhi zaroori hai

-

kabhi kabhi hum life me itna busy ho jaate hain ki life hume hi bor kar deti hai. itne bore ho jaate hain ki life enjoy karna to door ki baat hai hum to zindagi hi jeena bhool jaate hai. khud ko machine ki tarah treat karne lag jaate hai, machine bhi apna dard kharab hokar kar hi deti hai to phir hum to insaan hai. kyu apni life ko seriously nahi lete. khud ko behtar banane ke chakkar me khud me hi gum ho jaate hain ye bhi nahi sochte ki jinki wajah se hum hai or jinke liye ye sab kar rahe hain agar unhe hi khush na rakh paaye tab to ye mehnat bekaar hi hai na. kabhi khud ke liye bhi time nikalo.khud khush raho to pariwaar ko bhi khush rakh paoge warna zindagi bhar ghadi me bhari chaabi ki tarah chalte rahoge or waqt se pehle hi dam nikal jayega. zindagi bahut chhoti hai jitna bhi kishish karlo waqt utna hi milega jitna kismat me hai to kyu na ise bharpoor jee lein aage ki soach kar abhi ka waqt kyu kharab karein . jab time mile apne liye kuch waqt nikale
apne busy shedule ko aise handle karo jaise bachpan me hum bina shedule banaye roz naya seekhte hain aur pata hi nahi chalta. khud ko bhi zara sa waqt de do. bhagwaan ne hamein itna pyara shareer diya isko khoobsoorat rakhna hamara farz banta hai.itna sundar man diya usko swach rakhna bhi to jaruri hai.haan zindagi me utaar chaadav aana to taye hai par us waqt ko bhi aise jio ki wo waqt kab nikal jaye tumhe pata hi na chale. burai ko apne par mat lo jab tak tum kisi ki kharab baaton ko khud par nahi loge tab tak tumpar uska koi asar bhi nahi hoga or jis waqt se bekaar ki baton ko dil se llaga liya to samjho zindagi ki gaadi wahin se kharab hone lagegi. to khush raho .sabko khush nahi bhi rakh paaye to kya hua tumhare chehre me sukoon ki muskurahat to hogi na.life me kabhi kabhi break bhi to zaroori hai na. goodluck.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

šŸŒŸPrivilege CommitteešŸŒŸ

-
šŸ“ŒAbout Committee of Privileges: ✍️It is a Standing Committee. ✍️ It came into being on 7 January 2013 as one half of the replacements for the Committee on Standards and Privileges. ✍️The functions of this committee are "Semi-judicial"  ✍️ Aimed to examine cases if breach of priviledges of the House and it's mrmbers and recommends appropriate action. šŸ“ŒMembers in Rajya Sabha - 10, nominated by Chairman . šŸ“Œ Members in Lok-Sabha - 15  nominated by the Speaker . ✍️In the Rajya Sabha, the deputy chairperson heads the committee of privileges. šŸŒŸPowers and Functions: ✍️The committee examines every question involving a breach of privilege of the House or of the members or of any Committee thereof referred to it by the House or by the Speaker/Chairman.  ✍️It also determines with reference to the facts of each case whether a breach of privilege is involved and makes suitable recommendations in its report. ✍️In Rajya - Sabha When a question of privilege is referred to the Committe
Read more

‘India had parliamentary institutions when people of Europe were mere nomads’

-
Image
The quote by  Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, "India had parliamentary institutions when people of Europe were mere nomads,"  is a powerful testament to the ancient civilization's early advancements in governance and societal structures. It speaks volumes about the historical context of India's political systems, which were far more developed than often recognized in the common Eurocentric narrative of history. This essay will delve into the implications of Ambedkar's statement, exploring its historical accuracy, its significance in the context of Indian pride and identity, and its relevance in contemporary discussions about the origins and evolution of democratic institutions. Firstly, various historical records and scholarly research support the assertion that India had parliamentary institutions in ancient times. The 'sabha' and 'samiti' of the Vedic period, for instance, are indicative of consultative assemblies that played a role in governance. These bodie
Read more

Dr. D.C. Wadhwa & Ors. vs. State of Bihar & Ors. case of 1986

-
 The Dr. D.C. Wadhwa & Ors. vs. State of Bihar & Ors. case of 1986 is a cornerstone in the Indian judicial history, highlighting the delicate balance of power between the executive and legislative branches of government . The case stemmed from a practice that had become routine for the Bihar government: the re-promulgation of ordinances without legislative approval, a process that Dr. D.C. Wadhwa, an economics professor, found to be a subversion of democratic principles . The Supreme Court's decision in this case was a resounding affirmation of constitutional law and its supremacy over executive convenience. By declaring the practice of re-promulgating ordinances without legislative consent as unconstitutional, the court reinforced the necessity of legislative scrutiny and the impermanence of ordinances, which are meant to be emergency measures, not a backdoor for enacting laws. This landmark judgment serves as a reminder of the importance of checks and balances within
Read more