The Dr. D.C. Wadhwa & Ors. vs. State of Bihar & Ors. case of 1986 is a cornerstone in the Indian judicial history, highlighting the delicate balance of power between the executive and legislative branches of government . The case stemmed from a practice that had become routine for the Bihar government: the re-promulgation of ordinances without legislative approval, a process that Dr. D.C. Wadhwa, an economics professor, found to be a subversion of democratic principles . The Supreme Court's decision in this case was a resounding affirmation of constitutional law and its supremacy over executive convenience. By declaring the practice of re-promulgating ordinances without legislative consent as unconstitutional, the court reinforced the necessity of legislative scrutiny and the impermanence of ordinances, which are meant to be emergency measures, not a backdoor for enacting laws. This landmark judgment serves as a reminder of the importance of checks and balances within
anokha rishta
- Get link
- Other Apps
chhoti si kali thi, jo khilne chali thi,
kisi baag ki wo komal kali thi,
na thi koi chhaya , na marham si kaya
phir bhi kadi thi, wo khilne chali thi.
phir ek roz ek Asha ki kaya
aayi kiran banke jaise madhur geet chhaya
thi kaya nurani or kirne ruhani
badi khoobsoorat jaise pariyon ki raani
mili jab kali se wo nurani kaya
hawa bhi thi mehkti sugandhit si dhara
khili wo kali phir kirnon ke jatan se
aur aise khili jaise kaliyan chaman me
tha madhurya itna is rishte ki kasak me
jaise bheeni si khooboo mehki gagan me
hai rishta anokha anokhi kahani
jo meetha hai mishri sa aur sath nuraani
bandha pyaar se ye bandhan humara
jaise ganga ki behti wo pavitra dhaara
jiska roop hai komal aur anant dhaara
aisa hi hai ye rishta hamara
- Get link
- Other Apps
Popular posts from this blog
šPrivilege Committeeš
šAbout Committee of Privileges: ✍️It is a Standing Committee. ✍️ It came into being on 7 January 2013 as one half of the replacements for the Committee on Standards and Privileges. ✍️The functions of this committee are "Semi-judicial" ✍️ Aimed to examine cases if breach of priviledges of the House and it's mrmbers and recommends appropriate action. šMembers in Rajya Sabha - 10, nominated by Chairman . š Members in Lok-Sabha - 15 nominated by the Speaker . ✍️In the Rajya Sabha, the deputy chairperson heads the committee of privileges. šPowers and Functions: ✍️The committee examines every question involving a breach of privilege of the House or of the members or of any Committee thereof referred to it by the House or by the Speaker/Chairman. ✍️It also determines with reference to the facts of each case whether a breach of privilege is involved and makes suitable recommendations in its report. ✍️In Rajya - Sabha When a question of privilege is referred to the Committe
‘India had parliamentary institutions when people of Europe were mere nomads’
The quote by Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, "India had parliamentary institutions when people of Europe were mere nomads," is a powerful testament to the ancient civilization's early advancements in governance and societal structures. It speaks volumes about the historical context of India's political systems, which were far more developed than often recognized in the common Eurocentric narrative of history. This essay will delve into the implications of Ambedkar's statement, exploring its historical accuracy, its significance in the context of Indian pride and identity, and its relevance in contemporary discussions about the origins and evolution of democratic institutions. Firstly, various historical records and scholarly research support the assertion that India had parliamentary institutions in ancient times. The 'sabha' and 'samiti' of the Vedic period, for instance, are indicative of consultative assemblies that played a role in governance. These bodie
Dr. D.C. Wadhwa & Ors. vs. State of Bihar & Ors. case of 1986
The Dr. D.C. Wadhwa & Ors. vs. State of Bihar & Ors. case of 1986 is a cornerstone in the Indian judicial history, highlighting the delicate balance of power between the executive and legislative branches of government . The case stemmed from a practice that had become routine for the Bihar government: the re-promulgation of ordinances without legislative approval, a process that Dr. D.C. Wadhwa, an economics professor, found to be a subversion of democratic principles . The Supreme Court's decision in this case was a resounding affirmation of constitutional law and its supremacy over executive convenience. By declaring the practice of re-promulgating ordinances without legislative consent as unconstitutional, the court reinforced the necessity of legislative scrutiny and the impermanence of ordinances, which are meant to be emergency measures, not a backdoor for enacting laws. This landmark judgment serves as a reminder of the importance of checks and balances within
Comments