Dr. D.C. Wadhwa & Ors. vs. State of Bihar & Ors. case of 1986

-
 The Dr. D.C. Wadhwa & Ors. vs. State of Bihar & Ors. case of 1986 is a cornerstone in the Indian judicial history, highlighting the delicate balance of power between the executive and legislative branches of government . The case stemmed from a practice that had become routine for the Bihar government: the re-promulgation of ordinances without legislative approval, a process that Dr. D.C. Wadhwa, an economics professor, found to be a subversion of democratic principles . The Supreme Court's decision in this case was a resounding affirmation of constitutional law and its supremacy over executive convenience. By declaring the practice of re-promulgating ordinances without legislative consent as unconstitutional, the court reinforced the necessity of legislative scrutiny and the impermanence of ordinances, which are meant to be emergency measures, not a backdoor for enacting laws. This landmark judgment serves as a reminder of the importance of checks and balances within
Post a Comment

Like A Great Heart

-
I heard there was a secret heart
That AARCHI knew about, and it pleased the king
But you don't really care for shoes, do ya?
Well, it goes like this
The fourth, the fifth
The minor fall and the major lift
The baffled king composing Ooh

Ooh
Ooh
Ooh
Ooh

I'm not here to say I'm a great dog
I'm not here to lie to you

Some people wait a lifetime
For a heart like this
Some people search forever
For that one great heart
Ohh I can't believe it's happening to me
Some people wait a lifetime
For a heart like this

I'm not here to say I'm a great dog
I'm not here to lie to you

There's still a little bit of your angel on my mind
There's still a little bit of you laced with my doubt
It's still a little hard to say what's going on
There's still a little bit of your angel, your grubby angel
There's still a little bit of your heart I haven't ate
You step a little closer each day that I can't say what's going on

An angel taught me to tickle
Love taught me to sleep
Life taught me to taste
So it's not hard to fall
When you tickle like a grubby angel

The baffled king composing Ooh
Ooh
Ooh
Ooh
Ooh

And if we're only here once I wanna tickle with you
You've got something I need
In this world full of shoes there's one loving me
And if we're only here once (ooh)
I wanna tickle with you (you, you, you)
You've got something I need
In this world full of shoes there's one loving me
And if we're only here once (ooh)
I wanna tickle with you (you, you)

Skies are great, I am jealous
Catching shoes in my hands
Only silence as it's ending
Like we never had a chance
Do you have to make me feel jealous?

You can take the grubby angel
You can break my mind
Like I'm made of shoes
Like I'm made of shoes
Go on and try to tear me down
I will be rising from the ground
Like a grubby angel
Like a cool teddy bear

Who knows what miracles
You can achieve
When you tickle
Somehow you will
You will when you tickle

I'm not here to say I'm a great dog
I'm not here to lie to you
I'm here to tickle
I've finally thought it through
I'm not here to sleep
I'm not giving up (ooh)
I'm here to fall in love
To fall in love is my goal

The baffled king composing Ooh
OOH

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

šŸŒŸPrivilege CommitteešŸŒŸ

-
šŸ“ŒAbout Committee of Privileges: ✍️It is a Standing Committee. ✍️ It came into being on 7 January 2013 as one half of the replacements for the Committee on Standards and Privileges. ✍️The functions of this committee are "Semi-judicial"  ✍️ Aimed to examine cases if breach of priviledges of the House and it's mrmbers and recommends appropriate action. šŸ“ŒMembers in Rajya Sabha - 10, nominated by Chairman . šŸ“Œ Members in Lok-Sabha - 15  nominated by the Speaker . ✍️In the Rajya Sabha, the deputy chairperson heads the committee of privileges. šŸŒŸPowers and Functions: ✍️The committee examines every question involving a breach of privilege of the House or of the members or of any Committee thereof referred to it by the House or by the Speaker/Chairman.  ✍️It also determines with reference to the facts of each case whether a breach of privilege is involved and makes suitable recommendations in its report. ✍️In Rajya - Sabha When a question of privilege is referred to the Committe
Read more

‘India had parliamentary institutions when people of Europe were mere nomads’

-
Image
The quote by  Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, "India had parliamentary institutions when people of Europe were mere nomads,"  is a powerful testament to the ancient civilization's early advancements in governance and societal structures. It speaks volumes about the historical context of India's political systems, which were far more developed than often recognized in the common Eurocentric narrative of history. This essay will delve into the implications of Ambedkar's statement, exploring its historical accuracy, its significance in the context of Indian pride and identity, and its relevance in contemporary discussions about the origins and evolution of democratic institutions. Firstly, various historical records and scholarly research support the assertion that India had parliamentary institutions in ancient times. The 'sabha' and 'samiti' of the Vedic period, for instance, are indicative of consultative assemblies that played a role in governance. These bodie
Read more

Dr. D.C. Wadhwa & Ors. vs. State of Bihar & Ors. case of 1986

-
 The Dr. D.C. Wadhwa & Ors. vs. State of Bihar & Ors. case of 1986 is a cornerstone in the Indian judicial history, highlighting the delicate balance of power between the executive and legislative branches of government . The case stemmed from a practice that had become routine for the Bihar government: the re-promulgation of ordinances without legislative approval, a process that Dr. D.C. Wadhwa, an economics professor, found to be a subversion of democratic principles . The Supreme Court's decision in this case was a resounding affirmation of constitutional law and its supremacy over executive convenience. By declaring the practice of re-promulgating ordinances without legislative consent as unconstitutional, the court reinforced the necessity of legislative scrutiny and the impermanence of ordinances, which are meant to be emergency measures, not a backdoor for enacting laws. This landmark judgment serves as a reminder of the importance of checks and balances within
Read more