Important National Movements Of India's Indipendence 1947. #UPSC

-
The Indian National Movement was a series of political, social, and economic struggles aimed at ending British colonial rule in India. Some important movements that played a critical role in India's struggle for independence are:

1. Non-Cooperation Movement (1920-22): Led by Mahatma Gandhi, this movement urged Indians to boycott British goods, institutions, and laws. It was a peaceful protest against British .
crucial role in India's struggle for independence are as follows:

1. Non-Cooperation Movement: Launched by Mahatma Gandhi in 1920, the movement aimed to boycott British goods and institutions and promote Indian products. The movement gained momentum across the country but was called off after the Chauri Chaura incident.

2. Civil Disobedience Movement: Started in 1930, the movement aimed to challenge British laws by breaking them through non-violent protests. It included the famous Salt Satyagraha led by Gandhi, in which people violated the salt laws and made their own salt.

3. Quit India Movement: Launched in 1942 by the Indian National Congress, the movement demanded immediate independence and called for the British to leave India. The movement saw massive public participation but was met with harsh repression by British authorities.

4. Khilafat Movement: Launched in 1919 by Indian Muslims, the movement aimed to protect the caliphate of the Ottoman Empire and challenge British imperial policies in the Middle East. The movement united Hindus and Muslims against British rule.

5. Swadeshi Movement: Launched in 1905, the movement aimed to promote Indian industries and boycott British goods. It led to the nationalistic fervor in the country and saw the promotion of home-grown products.

These movements played a crucial role in unifying the Indian masses and building a sustained resistance against British colonial rule, leading to India's eventual independence in 1947.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is the Sanctity of Parliamentary Debate, Which Lies at the Core of Democratic Decision-Making, Being Compromised?

-
From the historical view where the core of parliamentary debates was based on public welfare, the utilitarianism principle where every individual was very much aware of being responsible for his/her words towards the public, their actions and reactions were under the basic rule. The decorum of parliament was maintained and the politicians were public servants thinking of a collective decision where the core value was to take a step in the public welfare way. Thinking of that era when like-minded people were making decisions for a common vision that was devoted to a well-developed nation as a whole. But if we talk about today's debates they sound to be senseless.   Fighting with the elders, breaking public property, unethical slogans, and quotations to put-down the individual's public and private image is not at all the act of the responsible member of parliament. The core value is dying with the baseless debates where logical thinking and analytical norms are missing. There wa...
Read more

‘India had parliamentary institutions when people of Europe were mere nomads’

-
Image
The quote by  Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, "India had parliamentary institutions when people of Europe were mere nomads,"  is a powerful testament to the ancient civilization's early advancements in governance and societal structures. It speaks volumes about the historical context of India's political systems, which were far more developed than often recognized in the common Eurocentric narrative of history. This essay will delve into the implications of Ambedkar's statement, exploring its historical accuracy, its significance in the context of Indian pride and identity, and its relevance in contemporary discussions about the origins and evolution of democratic institutions. Firstly, various historical records and scholarly research support the assertion that India had parliamentary institutions in ancient times. The 'sabha' and 'samiti' of the Vedic period, for instance, are indicative of consultative assemblies that played a role in governance. These bodie...
Read more

Dr. D.C. Wadhwa & Ors. vs. State of Bihar & Ors. case of 1986

-
 The Dr. D.C. Wadhwa & Ors. vs. State of Bihar & Ors. case of 1986 is a cornerstone in the Indian judicial history, highlighting the delicate balance of power between the executive and legislative branches of government . The case stemmed from a practice that had become routine for the Bihar government: the re-promulgation of ordinances without legislative approval, a process that Dr. D.C. Wadhwa, an economics professor, found to be a subversion of democratic principles . The Supreme Court's decision in this case was a resounding affirmation of constitutional law and its supremacy over executive convenience. By declaring the practice of re-promulgating ordinances without legislative consent as unconstitutional, the court reinforced the necessity of legislative scrutiny and the impermanence of ordinances, which are meant to be emergency measures, not a backdoor for enacting laws. This landmark judgment serves as a reminder of the importance of checks and balances within ...
Read more