Dr. D.C. Wadhwa & Ors. vs. State of Bihar & Ors. case of 1986

-
 The Dr. D.C. Wadhwa & Ors. vs. State of Bihar & Ors. case of 1986 is a cornerstone in the Indian judicial history, highlighting the delicate balance of power between the executive and legislative branches of government . The case stemmed from a practice that had become routine for the Bihar government: the re-promulgation of ordinances without legislative approval, a process that Dr. D.C. Wadhwa, an economics professor, found to be a subversion of democratic principles . The Supreme Court's decision in this case was a resounding affirmation of constitutional law and its supremacy over executive convenience. By declaring the practice of re-promulgating ordinances without legislative consent as unconstitutional, the court reinforced the necessity of legislative scrutiny and the impermanence of ordinances, which are meant to be emergency measures, not a backdoor for enacting laws. This landmark judgment serves as a reminder of the importance of checks and balances within
Post a Comment

The Delhi Declaration

-
🖋️The Delhi Declaration 5 Major highlights

👉Strong and sustainable growth.
👉Accelerating Progress on SDGs.
👉Green development
👉Multilatetal Institutions for the 21st     century.
👉Reviving Global Cooperation.

🚨Major issues to counter
🔆 Counter terrorism.
🔆 It commits to Support Financial Action Task Force {FATF} It's the same "watchdog" which have put Pakistan on its grey list.
🔆 Regulating , supervising, and overseeing the cripto markets.
🔆Climate Change - Urging all countries to follow "Paris Agreement" , 2℃ Would be a blessing says the experts.

🚩Is Delhi Declaration better then other climate change.
👉here are the three reasons
✅1st time G20 has talked about trippling the renewal energy by 2030 globally.
✅It us the 1st document which highleted about Fossil subsidies.
✅Huge increments in billions to trillions in "Climate Finances".
🖋️1st session "One Earth One Family" has already done.
🖋️2nd is on the floor that is "One Future".

🚩Till now ,India has hosted more than 220 G20 meetings. 17 of them were minister level meetings across the country. Across India in around 60 cities.
🚩Right now 43 world leaders are present in Delhi ,these are heads of states,heads of global states like the UN and World Bank. 
👉There are 25000 delegates from more than 115 countries in India's National Capital. so the participation is very high and so are it's outcome impacts.
👉India has released around around 112 outcome documents. that is 2 to 5 times higher then the past G20 precidencies.

🖋️They show three values

✨ Diversity
✨ Consultation
✨ Delivery

So it's the time that India has proved to be one of the robust Nation and a global leader in terms of Defence,IR, Stategical alliance,Infrastructure,Land,water,air,
and now space robust command and stand over various issues related to climate change, cripto currencies, terrorism and an alternative approach to Chinas Belt and road Initiative and also global voice of global south and has taken action to raise concerns. This includes sending vaccines and medicines to developing countries during the Covid pandemic.
It's a high time fir India to become a permanent member in UNSC.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

🌟Privilege Committee🌟

-
📌About Committee of Privileges: ✍️It is a Standing Committee. ✍️ It came into being on 7 January 2013 as one half of the replacements for the Committee on Standards and Privileges. ✍️The functions of this committee are "Semi-judicial"  ✍️ Aimed to examine cases if breach of priviledges of the House and it's mrmbers and recommends appropriate action. 📌Members in Rajya Sabha - 10, nominated by Chairman . 📌 Members in Lok-Sabha - 15  nominated by the Speaker . ✍️In the Rajya Sabha, the deputy chairperson heads the committee of privileges. 🌟Powers and Functions: ✍️The committee examines every question involving a breach of privilege of the House or of the members or of any Committee thereof referred to it by the House or by the Speaker/Chairman.  ✍️It also determines with reference to the facts of each case whether a breach of privilege is involved and makes suitable recommendations in its report. ✍️In Rajya - Sabha When a question of privilege is referred to the Committe
Read more

‘India had parliamentary institutions when people of Europe were mere nomads’

-
Image
The quote by  Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, "India had parliamentary institutions when people of Europe were mere nomads,"  is a powerful testament to the ancient civilization's early advancements in governance and societal structures. It speaks volumes about the historical context of India's political systems, which were far more developed than often recognized in the common Eurocentric narrative of history. This essay will delve into the implications of Ambedkar's statement, exploring its historical accuracy, its significance in the context of Indian pride and identity, and its relevance in contemporary discussions about the origins and evolution of democratic institutions. Firstly, various historical records and scholarly research support the assertion that India had parliamentary institutions in ancient times. The 'sabha' and 'samiti' of the Vedic period, for instance, are indicative of consultative assemblies that played a role in governance. These bodie
Read more

Dr. D.C. Wadhwa & Ors. vs. State of Bihar & Ors. case of 1986

-
 The Dr. D.C. Wadhwa & Ors. vs. State of Bihar & Ors. case of 1986 is a cornerstone in the Indian judicial history, highlighting the delicate balance of power between the executive and legislative branches of government . The case stemmed from a practice that had become routine for the Bihar government: the re-promulgation of ordinances without legislative approval, a process that Dr. D.C. Wadhwa, an economics professor, found to be a subversion of democratic principles . The Supreme Court's decision in this case was a resounding affirmation of constitutional law and its supremacy over executive convenience. By declaring the practice of re-promulgating ordinances without legislative consent as unconstitutional, the court reinforced the necessity of legislative scrutiny and the impermanence of ordinances, which are meant to be emergency measures, not a backdoor for enacting laws. This landmark judgment serves as a reminder of the importance of checks and balances within
Read more