Dr. D.C. Wadhwa & Ors. vs. State of Bihar & Ors. case of 1986

-
 The Dr. D.C. Wadhwa & Ors. vs. State of Bihar & Ors. case of 1986 is a cornerstone in the Indian judicial history, highlighting the delicate balance of power between the executive and legislative branches of government . The case stemmed from a practice that had become routine for the Bihar government: the re-promulgation of ordinances without legislative approval, a process that Dr. D.C. Wadhwa, an economics professor, found to be a subversion of democratic principles . The Supreme Court's decision in this case was a resounding affirmation of constitutional law and its supremacy over executive convenience. By declaring the practice of re-promulgating ordinances without legislative consent as unconstitutional, the court reinforced the necessity of legislative scrutiny and the impermanence of ordinances, which are meant to be emergency measures, not a backdoor for enacting laws. This landmark judgment serves as a reminder of the importance of checks and balances within
Post a Comment

The Amitabh Buddha

-

🌼 Amitabh Buddha🌼

🌷according to the scriptures of Mahayana Buddhisim it is also known as "Amuda or Amitayus".

🌷The word Amitabha formed by two words 1. "Amita" which means without bound or infinite and "Abha"which means light splender. therefore it all together becomes "He who posses light without bound".

🌷The "Amitayus" is formed by the amalgamation of "Amit" - infinite and "Ayus" that is Life❤️

🌷It is interpreted as "He whose life  is boundless".

🌷The Chinese name for Amitabh is " Wuliangguang"

🌷However ,these names are not used to call "Amitabh Buddha".

🌷In tibbetteian , "Amitabh" is called as "od doag med"
opakme and for Amutayus , it's "tshe dpag med and Tsepakme.

🌷In pure land "Buddhism" , Amitabh is regarded as the principal 

🌟48 vows means pure land "conditions that being have to follow"  in order to get born in that pure land and also mentions about the beings if they would be reborn there.
🌟18 vows - prevelant mainly in China,Veitnam ,Korea and Japan . It mentions that any being calling upon "Amitabh" name even as few ten times will be guaranteed to have a birth in that "Pure land ".
🌟19 vows - Promises that if he along with other bodhi sattavas will appear before those who call upon him at the moment if death.

🌼 Important enlightenment techniques🌼

🧘 Visualization of the surrounding world as a paradise. It is believed that at the time of death if the person visualuses "Amitabh" in the heaven over over their head and reciet his name as a mantra and leave the body as a soul through the crown chakras then he can come to "Sukhavati" pure-land.
            Fir overcoming our desires or self-fishness one should focus on "Amitabh" while medidating.

🧘🌼🌟The meditation mudra🌟🌼🧘

Amitabh is often depicted displaying the meditation mudra (gently folded over the lap with palms facing upward) or exposition mudra when shown seated. 

🌼When standing, Amitabh is shown with the right hand raised with thumb and forefinger touching, and with left arm extended downward with thumb and forefinger touching. 

🌼This mudra means that wisdom (raised hand) is accessible to even the lowest beings and Compassion (outstretched hand) is directed at the lowest beings. 

🌼Amitabh is also portrayed with two disciples- Avalokitesvara on the right and Mahasthamaprapta on the left.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

🌟Privilege Committee🌟

-
📌About Committee of Privileges: ✍️It is a Standing Committee. ✍️ It came into being on 7 January 2013 as one half of the replacements for the Committee on Standards and Privileges. ✍️The functions of this committee are "Semi-judicial"  ✍️ Aimed to examine cases if breach of priviledges of the House and it's mrmbers and recommends appropriate action. 📌Members in Rajya Sabha - 10, nominated by Chairman . 📌 Members in Lok-Sabha - 15  nominated by the Speaker . ✍️In the Rajya Sabha, the deputy chairperson heads the committee of privileges. 🌟Powers and Functions: ✍️The committee examines every question involving a breach of privilege of the House or of the members or of any Committee thereof referred to it by the House or by the Speaker/Chairman.  ✍️It also determines with reference to the facts of each case whether a breach of privilege is involved and makes suitable recommendations in its report. ✍️In Rajya - Sabha When a question of privilege is referred to the Committe
Read more

‘India had parliamentary institutions when people of Europe were mere nomads’

-
Image
The quote by  Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, "India had parliamentary institutions when people of Europe were mere nomads,"  is a powerful testament to the ancient civilization's early advancements in governance and societal structures. It speaks volumes about the historical context of India's political systems, which were far more developed than often recognized in the common Eurocentric narrative of history. This essay will delve into the implications of Ambedkar's statement, exploring its historical accuracy, its significance in the context of Indian pride and identity, and its relevance in contemporary discussions about the origins and evolution of democratic institutions. Firstly, various historical records and scholarly research support the assertion that India had parliamentary institutions in ancient times. The 'sabha' and 'samiti' of the Vedic period, for instance, are indicative of consultative assemblies that played a role in governance. These bodie
Read more

Dr. D.C. Wadhwa & Ors. vs. State of Bihar & Ors. case of 1986

-
 The Dr. D.C. Wadhwa & Ors. vs. State of Bihar & Ors. case of 1986 is a cornerstone in the Indian judicial history, highlighting the delicate balance of power between the executive and legislative branches of government . The case stemmed from a practice that had become routine for the Bihar government: the re-promulgation of ordinances without legislative approval, a process that Dr. D.C. Wadhwa, an economics professor, found to be a subversion of democratic principles . The Supreme Court's decision in this case was a resounding affirmation of constitutional law and its supremacy over executive convenience. By declaring the practice of re-promulgating ordinances without legislative consent as unconstitutional, the court reinforced the necessity of legislative scrutiny and the impermanence of ordinances, which are meant to be emergency measures, not a backdoor for enacting laws. This landmark judgment serves as a reminder of the importance of checks and balances within
Read more