The Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA)

-
The Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) , introduced in 2005 by the Ministry of Rural Development , is one of the world's largest work guarantee programs.  It aims to strengthen livelihood security in rural areas by providing 100 days of assured wage employment each year to adult members of rural households willing to engage in unskilled manual labor. This initiative plays a vital role in promoting economic stability, empowering communities, and fostering sustainable development across India's rural landscape. The Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) stands as a monumental testament to India's commitment to social welfare and rural empowerment. Enacted in 2005, this groundbreaking initiative has evolved into one of the most significant pillars of support for rural populations across the country. Imagine a program that guarantees 100 days of wage employment annually to adult members of rural households—this is not jus...
Post a Comment

Rakshabandhan

-

Rakshabandhan  sirf ek dhage ka hi nahi balki ye wo rishta hai jisme ek behen apne bhai ko pyaar,dulaar,natkhat shaitaniya apne bhaai ke kalaii par  bandhkar  ek bhaii ko uske rakshak aur jimmedaar hone ka ehsaas karaati hai aur bhai  apni pyaari behna ko tohfa dekar uski raksha karne ka vachan deta hai...apni behen ki har muskuraahat aur khusi ka khayaal rakhta hai...bas inhi kuch sabdon ke saath mai itna kehna chaahti hoon ki bhaai aur behen me chahe kitne bhi jhagde kyun  na ho par behen ki ek cheekh par wahi bhaai daudkar uske paas malham lekar aata hai to wahi jab bhaai der tak ghar me nahi dikhta to uske aansuon me uski chintayein chalak hi aati hai.

Khair ...ye mere hi kuch bitaaye hue aise lamhe hain jo maine kabhi apne bhaai ke saath jiye the ..mera bhaai jiske saath me hamesha ladti ,jagadti thi...par ab wahi ladna jhagadna mujhe yaad aata hai aur phir mere aansuon me beh jaata hai,,,...
Mai jaanti hoon ki wo lamhe ab dobara kabhi nahi aayenge par tumhari yaad sirf rakshabandhan  me hi nahi balki har teej,tyohaar me aati hai har din har lamho me tumhara jikra hota hai...kehne ko bahut kuch hai...par kehna mushkil ho raha hai..jaane kaise tum achaanak hi hamein akela kar gaye..tumhare tasveer par har saal ki tarah is baar bhi teeka lagaungi aur taufe me ...bas dua karungi ki tumhara agla janam bhi mere bhaai ke roop me ho taaki is janam me jo hamari dosti me kamiyan thi mai use door kar sakun or tumhe phir hamse door kabhi  na jaane doon.tumhare bin parivaar ka ek hissa khaali ho gaya hai jiski kami hamesha hi hamein khalegi...kabhi -kabhi chupkar roti bhi hoon par mai apne aansuon  ko kisi ke saamne nahi aane deti kyounki  in aansuon se baaki ke log bhi toot jayenge...tumhari hamesha yaad aati rahegi...kash is jag ko alvida kehne se pehle tumne hamaare baare me socha hota to ...shaayad tumne hamare baare me jaroor socha hoga ..par shaayad tum is duniya ki berukhi aur uljhanon ko suljha nahi paaye...kaash tumne hamse baat ki hoti...to aaj tum hamare saath hote............
Tum hamesha hamari yadon me rahoge...

.....tumhari behen.......

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is the Sanctity of Parliamentary Debate, Which Lies at the Core of Democratic Decision-Making, Being Compromised?

-
From the historical view where the core of parliamentary debates was based on public welfare, the utilitarianism principle where every individual was very much aware of being responsible for his/her words towards the public, their actions and reactions were under the basic rule. The decorum of parliament was maintained and the politicians were public servants thinking of a collective decision where the core value was to take a step in the public welfare way. Thinking of that era when like-minded people were making decisions for a common vision that was devoted to a well-developed nation as a whole. But if we talk about today's debates they sound to be senseless.   Fighting with the elders, breaking public property, unethical slogans, and quotations to put-down the individual's public and private image is not at all the act of the responsible member of parliament. The core value is dying with the baseless debates where logical thinking and analytical norms are missing. There wa...
Read more

‘India had parliamentary institutions when people of Europe were mere nomads’

-
Image
The quote by  Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, "India had parliamentary institutions when people of Europe were mere nomads,"  is a powerful testament to the ancient civilization's early advancements in governance and societal structures. It speaks volumes about the historical context of India's political systems, which were far more developed than often recognized in the common Eurocentric narrative of history. This essay will delve into the implications of Ambedkar's statement, exploring its historical accuracy, its significance in the context of Indian pride and identity, and its relevance in contemporary discussions about the origins and evolution of democratic institutions. Firstly, various historical records and scholarly research support the assertion that India had parliamentary institutions in ancient times. The 'sabha' and 'samiti' of the Vedic period, for instance, are indicative of consultative assemblies that played a role in governance. These bodie...
Read more

Dr. D.C. Wadhwa & Ors. vs. State of Bihar & Ors. case of 1986

-
 The Dr. D.C. Wadhwa & Ors. vs. State of Bihar & Ors. case of 1986 is a cornerstone in the Indian judicial history, highlighting the delicate balance of power between the executive and legislative branches of government . The case stemmed from a practice that had become routine for the Bihar government: the re-promulgation of ordinances without legislative approval, a process that Dr. D.C. Wadhwa, an economics professor, found to be a subversion of democratic principles . The Supreme Court's decision in this case was a resounding affirmation of constitutional law and its supremacy over executive convenience. By declaring the practice of re-promulgating ordinances without legislative consent as unconstitutional, the court reinforced the necessity of legislative scrutiny and the impermanence of ordinances, which are meant to be emergency measures, not a backdoor for enacting laws. This landmark judgment serves as a reminder of the importance of checks and balances within ...
Read more