Dr. D.C. Wadhwa & Ors. vs. State of Bihar & Ors. case of 1986

-
 The Dr. D.C. Wadhwa & Ors. vs. State of Bihar & Ors. case of 1986 is a cornerstone in the Indian judicial history, highlighting the delicate balance of power between the executive and legislative branches of government . The case stemmed from a practice that had become routine for the Bihar government: the re-promulgation of ordinances without legislative approval, a process that Dr. D.C. Wadhwa, an economics professor, found to be a subversion of democratic principles . The Supreme Court's decision in this case was a resounding affirmation of constitutional law and its supremacy over executive convenience. By declaring the practice of re-promulgating ordinances without legislative consent as unconstitutional, the court reinforced the necessity of legislative scrutiny and the impermanence of ordinances, which are meant to be emergency measures, not a backdoor for enacting laws. This landmark judgment serves as a reminder of the importance of checks and balances within
Post a Comment

Rakshabandhan

-

Rakshabandhan  sirf ek dhage ka hi nahi balki ye wo rishta hai jisme ek behen apne bhai ko pyaar,dulaar,natkhat shaitaniya apne bhaai ke kalaii par  bandhkar  ek bhaii ko uske rakshak aur jimmedaar hone ka ehsaas karaati hai aur bhai  apni pyaari behna ko tohfa dekar uski raksha karne ka vachan deta hai...apni behen ki har muskuraahat aur khusi ka khayaal rakhta hai...bas inhi kuch sabdon ke saath mai itna kehna chaahti hoon ki bhaai aur behen me chahe kitne bhi jhagde kyun  na ho par behen ki ek cheekh par wahi bhaai daudkar uske paas malham lekar aata hai to wahi jab bhaai der tak ghar me nahi dikhta to uske aansuon me uski chintayein chalak hi aati hai.

Khair ...ye mere hi kuch bitaaye hue aise lamhe hain jo maine kabhi apne bhaai ke saath jiye the ..mera bhaai jiske saath me hamesha ladti ,jagadti thi...par ab wahi ladna jhagadna mujhe yaad aata hai aur phir mere aansuon me beh jaata hai,,,...
Mai jaanti hoon ki wo lamhe ab dobara kabhi nahi aayenge par tumhari yaad sirf rakshabandhan  me hi nahi balki har teej,tyohaar me aati hai har din har lamho me tumhara jikra hota hai...kehne ko bahut kuch hai...par kehna mushkil ho raha hai..jaane kaise tum achaanak hi hamein akela kar gaye..tumhare tasveer par har saal ki tarah is baar bhi teeka lagaungi aur taufe me ...bas dua karungi ki tumhara agla janam bhi mere bhaai ke roop me ho taaki is janam me jo hamari dosti me kamiyan thi mai use door kar sakun or tumhe phir hamse door kabhi  na jaane doon.tumhare bin parivaar ka ek hissa khaali ho gaya hai jiski kami hamesha hi hamein khalegi...kabhi -kabhi chupkar roti bhi hoon par mai apne aansuon  ko kisi ke saamne nahi aane deti kyounki  in aansuon se baaki ke log bhi toot jayenge...tumhari hamesha yaad aati rahegi...kash is jag ko alvida kehne se pehle tumne hamaare baare me socha hota to ...shaayad tumne hamare baare me jaroor socha hoga ..par shaayad tum is duniya ki berukhi aur uljhanon ko suljha nahi paaye...kaash tumne hamse baat ki hoti...to aaj tum hamare saath hote............
Tum hamesha hamari yadon me rahoge...

.....tumhari behen.......

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

šŸŒŸPrivilege CommitteešŸŒŸ

-
šŸ“ŒAbout Committee of Privileges: ✍️It is a Standing Committee. ✍️ It came into being on 7 January 2013 as one half of the replacements for the Committee on Standards and Privileges. ✍️The functions of this committee are "Semi-judicial"  ✍️ Aimed to examine cases if breach of priviledges of the House and it's mrmbers and recommends appropriate action. šŸ“ŒMembers in Rajya Sabha - 10, nominated by Chairman . šŸ“Œ Members in Lok-Sabha - 15  nominated by the Speaker . ✍️In the Rajya Sabha, the deputy chairperson heads the committee of privileges. šŸŒŸPowers and Functions: ✍️The committee examines every question involving a breach of privilege of the House or of the members or of any Committee thereof referred to it by the House or by the Speaker/Chairman.  ✍️It also determines with reference to the facts of each case whether a breach of privilege is involved and makes suitable recommendations in its report. ✍️In Rajya - Sabha When a question of privilege is referred to the Committe
Read more

‘India had parliamentary institutions when people of Europe were mere nomads’

-
Image
The quote by  Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, "India had parliamentary institutions when people of Europe were mere nomads,"  is a powerful testament to the ancient civilization's early advancements in governance and societal structures. It speaks volumes about the historical context of India's political systems, which were far more developed than often recognized in the common Eurocentric narrative of history. This essay will delve into the implications of Ambedkar's statement, exploring its historical accuracy, its significance in the context of Indian pride and identity, and its relevance in contemporary discussions about the origins and evolution of democratic institutions. Firstly, various historical records and scholarly research support the assertion that India had parliamentary institutions in ancient times. The 'sabha' and 'samiti' of the Vedic period, for instance, are indicative of consultative assemblies that played a role in governance. These bodie
Read more

Dr. D.C. Wadhwa & Ors. vs. State of Bihar & Ors. case of 1986

-
 The Dr. D.C. Wadhwa & Ors. vs. State of Bihar & Ors. case of 1986 is a cornerstone in the Indian judicial history, highlighting the delicate balance of power between the executive and legislative branches of government . The case stemmed from a practice that had become routine for the Bihar government: the re-promulgation of ordinances without legislative approval, a process that Dr. D.C. Wadhwa, an economics professor, found to be a subversion of democratic principles . The Supreme Court's decision in this case was a resounding affirmation of constitutional law and its supremacy over executive convenience. By declaring the practice of re-promulgating ordinances without legislative consent as unconstitutional, the court reinforced the necessity of legislative scrutiny and the impermanence of ordinances, which are meant to be emergency measures, not a backdoor for enacting laws. This landmark judgment serves as a reminder of the importance of checks and balances within
Read more