Comparative Analysis of Past Delimitation Exercises & Their Impact on Governance

-
Image
                          Comparative Analysis  Delimitation is the process of redrawing the boundaries of electoral constituencies to ensure fair representation based on population changes . In India, it is conducted by the Delimitation Commission , an independent body established under Article 82 (for Lok Sabha) and Article 170 (for State Assemblies) after every Census . Key Objectives of Delimitation ✔ Equal Representation – Ensures constituencies have uniform voter strength , preventing overrepresentation or underrepresentation.  ✔ Electoral Integrity – Adjusts boundaries to reflect demographic shifts , maintaining fair political representation .  ✔ Reservation Adjustments – Determines SC/ST reserved seats based on population distribution. Historical Timeline of Delimitation in India 📌 1952 – First delimitation based on the  1951 Census .  📌 1963 – Adjustments after state reorga...
Post a Comment

What does NATO means and why it is in news ?

-
The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) also known as the North Atlantic Alliance is an intergovernmental military alliance among 28 European countries and two North American countries.
image source wikipedia

➡️It was established in the aftermath effects of World War- II .
➡️ The organization implemented the North Atlantic Treaty which was signed on 4th april 1949.
➡️ It was founded on 4th April 1949 in Washington D.C.,united states.
➡️Headquarters : Brussels, Belgium
➡️ Aim :- To provide the collective security against the Soviet Union . In other words it aims to safeguard the freedom and security of all the NATO members by political and military means.
image source BBC

➡️Its original members were 
Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Iceland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, the United Kingdom, and the United States. 
➡️Joining the original signatories were Greece and Turkey (1952); West Germany (1955; from 1990 as Germany); Spain (1982); the Czech Republic, Hungary, and Poland (1999); Bulgaria, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, Slovakia, and Slovenia (2004); Albania and Croatia (2009); Montenegro (2017); and North Macedonia (2020). France withdrew from the integrated military command of NATO in 1966 but remained a member of the organization; it resumed its position in NATO’s military command in 2009.

➡️ AREAS of involment : Defence

✴️  Why Article 5 of NATO is in news?

➡️The Article 5 is in news because of the Russo-Ukrain war .But before that we need to understand what is article 5 in NATO.
➡️The Article 5 which is the heart of NATO  of the North Atlantic Treaty, in which the signatory members agrees that an armed attack against one or more of them(among NATO members) in Europe or North America shall be considered an attack against them all; and consequently they agree that, if such an armed attack occurs, each of them, in exercise of the right of individual or collective self-defense recognized by Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations, will assist the Party or Parties so attacked by taking forthwith, individually and in concert with the other Parties, such action as it deems necessary, including the use of armed force, to restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area.

✴️Why NATO is not sending military troops to help Ukraine❓

Ans ➡️"The purpose of NATO formation was to safeguard the freedom and security of all NATO members but keeping this aside NATO is not sending it's military troops to help Ukraine because it is bound by Article 5 .
➡️As given above that Article 5  is an agreement between the NATO members that ensures "Collective defence " ; which clearly means that an attack on any one ally will be considered an attack on all allies. This could happen if Russia shifts it's target to some of Ukraine's neighborhood that are NATO members.
➡️ Since Ukraine is a partner of the western defence alliance but not a NATO member that is why "Article 5 " or the "collective defence and security " Pleadge does not apply here.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is the Sanctity of Parliamentary Debate, Which Lies at the Core of Democratic Decision-Making, Being Compromised?

-
From the historical view where the core of parliamentary debates was based on public welfare, the utilitarianism principle where every individual was very much aware of being responsible for his/her words towards the public, their actions and reactions were under the basic rule. The decorum of parliament was maintained and the politicians were public servants thinking of a collective decision where the core value was to take a step in the public welfare way. Thinking of that era when like-minded people were making decisions for a common vision that was devoted to a well-developed nation as a whole. But if we talk about today's debates they sound to be senseless.   Fighting with the elders, breaking public property, unethical slogans, and quotations to put-down the individual's public and private image is not at all the act of the responsible member of parliament. The core value is dying with the baseless debates where logical thinking and analytical norms are missing. There wa...
Read more

‘India had parliamentary institutions when people of Europe were mere nomads’

-
Image
The quote by  Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, "India had parliamentary institutions when people of Europe were mere nomads,"  is a powerful testament to the ancient civilization's early advancements in governance and societal structures. It speaks volumes about the historical context of India's political systems, which were far more developed than often recognized in the common Eurocentric narrative of history. This essay will delve into the implications of Ambedkar's statement, exploring its historical accuracy, its significance in the context of Indian pride and identity, and its relevance in contemporary discussions about the origins and evolution of democratic institutions. Firstly, various historical records and scholarly research support the assertion that India had parliamentary institutions in ancient times. The 'sabha' and 'samiti' of the Vedic period, for instance, are indicative of consultative assemblies that played a role in governance. These bodie...
Read more

Navigating the Complexities of Cross-Border Insolvency

-
Image
Cross-border , or international insolvency, refers to scenarios where a financially distressed debtor has assets and creditors spread across various jurisdictions . This predominantly concerns multinational corporations rather than individual bankruptcies, presenting unique challenges and considerations. The Jet Airways Case Study A prominent example of cross-border insolvency is the Jet Airways case. The airline found itself entangled in insolvency proceedings in both India and the Netherlands. Initially, the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) in India declared the Dutch proceedings void. However, a cooperation protocol was later established, identifying the Indian proceedings as the main proceedings and the Dutch proceedings as non-main proceedings. This case underscores the intricacies and judicial diplomacy required in cross-border insolvency matters. Key Challenges Jurisdictional Issues : Identifying the primary jurisdiction's court over insolvency proceedings remains a com...
Read more