The Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA)

-
The Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) , introduced in 2005 by the Ministry of Rural Development , is one of the world's largest work guarantee programs.  It aims to strengthen livelihood security in rural areas by providing 100 days of assured wage employment each year to adult members of rural households willing to engage in unskilled manual labor. This initiative plays a vital role in promoting economic stability, empowering communities, and fostering sustainable development across India's rural landscape. The Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) stands as a monumental testament to India's commitment to social welfare and rural empowerment. Enacted in 2005, this groundbreaking initiative has evolved into one of the most significant pillars of support for rural populations across the country. Imagine a program that guarantees 100 days of wage employment annually to adult members of rural households—this is not jus...
Post a Comment

The Current Global Hunger Hotspots

-
The Hunger Hotspits are the areas which are likely to see the acute food insecurity increasing during the outlook period.
According to the state of food security and Nutrition in the world, every year ,thus most intensely scrutinized of FAO's repirts presents the headline number of undernourished people around the world.
The repirt says that the world is moving backwards in its efforts to end hunger,food insecurities and malnutrition in all its forms.
The countries which are under glibal hunger hotspits are as following:- 
1) Yemen: Yemen has been facing the worst humanitarian crisis in the world, with an estimated 20 million people in need of assistance. The conflictbetween the government and Houthi rebels has disrupted food production, distribution, and access, forcing many people to rely on aid. Other factors contributing to the severity of hunger in Yemen include high levels of poverty, inflation, and limited access to clean water .

2) South Sudan: South Sudan has been facing a severe food crisis due to ongoing conflict, displacement, and natural disasters. The country has been in a state of civil war since 2013, which has disrupted agriculture, displaced millions of people, and limited access to food and basic services. The country has also been affected by droughts and floods, which have further damaged crops and livestock. 

3) Somalia: Somalia has been facing recurrent droughts and conflict, which have contributed to the severity of hunger in the country. The ongoing conflict has displaced thousands of people, disrupted food production, and limited access to aid. The country has also been affected by locust swarms, which have damaged crops and exacerbated food insecurity. 

4) Syria: Syria has been facing a severe food crisis due to ongoing conflict and displacement. The conflict has damaged infrastructure, disrupted food production and distribution, and limited access to basic services. The country has also been affected by droughts, which have further damaged agriculture and livestock. 

5) Venezuela: Venezuela has been facing a severe economic and political crisis, which has led to high levels of inflation, poverty, and food insecurity. The country has been affected by a shortage of basic goods, including food and medicine, due to limited imports and political instability. 

Overall, the severity of hunger in these regions is due to a combination of factors, including conflict and displacement, natural disasters, economic instability, and limited access to basic services. Addressing these underlying issues requires a comprehensive and long-term approach that involves addressing the root causes of hunger and investing in development programs that improve access to food, water, and basic services.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is the Sanctity of Parliamentary Debate, Which Lies at the Core of Democratic Decision-Making, Being Compromised?

-
From the historical view where the core of parliamentary debates was based on public welfare, the utilitarianism principle where every individual was very much aware of being responsible for his/her words towards the public, their actions and reactions were under the basic rule. The decorum of parliament was maintained and the politicians were public servants thinking of a collective decision where the core value was to take a step in the public welfare way. Thinking of that era when like-minded people were making decisions for a common vision that was devoted to a well-developed nation as a whole. But if we talk about today's debates they sound to be senseless.   Fighting with the elders, breaking public property, unethical slogans, and quotations to put-down the individual's public and private image is not at all the act of the responsible member of parliament. The core value is dying with the baseless debates where logical thinking and analytical norms are missing. There wa...
Read more

‘India had parliamentary institutions when people of Europe were mere nomads’

-
Image
The quote by  Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, "India had parliamentary institutions when people of Europe were mere nomads,"  is a powerful testament to the ancient civilization's early advancements in governance and societal structures. It speaks volumes about the historical context of India's political systems, which were far more developed than often recognized in the common Eurocentric narrative of history. This essay will delve into the implications of Ambedkar's statement, exploring its historical accuracy, its significance in the context of Indian pride and identity, and its relevance in contemporary discussions about the origins and evolution of democratic institutions. Firstly, various historical records and scholarly research support the assertion that India had parliamentary institutions in ancient times. The 'sabha' and 'samiti' of the Vedic period, for instance, are indicative of consultative assemblies that played a role in governance. These bodie...
Read more

Dr. D.C. Wadhwa & Ors. vs. State of Bihar & Ors. case of 1986

-
 The Dr. D.C. Wadhwa & Ors. vs. State of Bihar & Ors. case of 1986 is a cornerstone in the Indian judicial history, highlighting the delicate balance of power between the executive and legislative branches of government . The case stemmed from a practice that had become routine for the Bihar government: the re-promulgation of ordinances without legislative approval, a process that Dr. D.C. Wadhwa, an economics professor, found to be a subversion of democratic principles . The Supreme Court's decision in this case was a resounding affirmation of constitutional law and its supremacy over executive convenience. By declaring the practice of re-promulgating ordinances without legislative consent as unconstitutional, the court reinforced the necessity of legislative scrutiny and the impermanence of ordinances, which are meant to be emergency measures, not a backdoor for enacting laws. This landmark judgment serves as a reminder of the importance of checks and balances within ...
Read more