📘 सफलता की सीढ़ी – 100 महत्वपूर्ण वस्तुनिष्ठ प्रश्न

-
"Learning Today, Leading Tomorrow" शिक्षिका एवं संकलक – Poornima Gontiya  📖 विषय शामिल हैं: अंतर्राष्ट्रीय संगठन मध्य प्रदेश सामान्य ज्ञान विटामिन एवं स्वास्थ्य भारतीय संविधान भारतीय दण्ड संहिता (IPC) 🌀 भाग 1 : अंतर्राष्ट्रीय संगठन (International Organizations) संयुक्त राष्ट्र संघ (UNO) की स्थापना कब हुई थी? (A) 1919 (B) 1945 (C) 1939 (D) 1950 UNICEF का मुख्य उद्देश्य क्या है? (A) शिक्षा (B) बच्चों का कल्याण (C) शांति स्थापना (D) चिकित्सा WHO का मुख्यालय कहाँ स्थित है? (A) पेरिस (B) जेनेवा (C) लंदन (D) न्यूयॉर्क IMF का पूरा नाम क्या है? (A) International Money Fund (B) International Monetary Fund (C) International Management Fund (D) International Member Fund UNESCO का मुख्यालय कहाँ है? (A) लंदन (B) पेरिस (C) बर्लिन (D) वॉशिंगटन विश्व बैंक की स्थापना कब हुई थी? (A) 1944 (B) 1950 (C) 1960 (D) 1972 SAARC की स्थापना किस वर्ष हुई थी? (A) 1985 (B) 1980 (C) 1990 (D) 1975 WTO का मुख्य उद्देश्य क्या है? (A) विश्व शांति (B) अंतर्राष्ट्रीय व्...
Post a Comment

Keisham Meghachandra Singh vs. The Hon’ble Speaker, Manipur Legislative Assembly case (2020)

-

 The Keisham Meghachandra Singh vs. The Hon’ble Speaker, Manipur Legislative Assembly case (2020) is a significant judgment concerning the Anti-Defection Law under the Tenth Schedule of the Indian Constitution. Here are the key points:

Background:

  • Election Context: The case arose after the 2017 Manipur Legislative Assembly elections, which resulted in a hung assembly. The Indian National Congress emerged as the single largest party, but the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) formed the government with the support of other parties and independent MLAs.

Key Issues:

  • Disqualification Petitions: Several petitions were filed seeking the disqualification of MLAs who had defected from the Congress to support the BJP.
  • Speaker’s Delay: The Speaker of the Manipur Legislative Assembly delayed the decision on these disqualification petitions, leading to legal challenges.

Supreme Court Verdict:

  • Timely Decision: The Supreme Court ruled that the Speaker must decide on disqualification petitions within a reasonable time frame, ideally within three months.
  • Judicial Review: The Court emphasized that the Speaker’s decisions are subject to judicial review, ensuring that they are not arbitrary or biased.
  • Independent Tribunal Recommendation: The Court suggested that Parliament consider establishing an independent tribunal, headed by a retired judge, to handle disqualification cases under the Tenth Schedule to avoid potential partisan behavior by the Speaker.

Significance:

  • Strengthening Anti-Defection Law: This judgment reinforced the importance of the Anti-Defection Law in maintaining the integrity of the legislative process.
  • Ensuring Accountability: By setting a time frame for the Speaker’s decisions and allowing judicial review, the Court aimed to ensure greater accountability and transparency in the handling of disqualification petitions.

This case has had a significant impact on the functioning of legislative assemblies and the enforcement of the Anti-Defection Law in India.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Jogimara and Sitabenga Caves

-
Image
   image source- PURATATTVA The   Jogimara and Sitabenga Caves , also known as the   Sitabenga Cave   or   Jogimara Cave , are ancient cave monuments nestled in the north side of the   Ramgarh hills   in Puta village,   Chhattisgarh, India .   These remarkable caves date back to approximately the  3rd-century BCE to 1st-century BCE  and hold significant historical and artistic value  1 . Here are some fascinating details about these caves: Non-Religious Inscriptions and Ancient Frescoes : The Jogimara and Sitabenga Caves are notable for their  non-religious inscriptions  in  Brahmi script  and  Magadhi language . They also feature  one of the oldest colored frescoes in Asia . Scholars debate whether the Sitabenga cave was an ancient performance theater or a resting place along an ancient trade route.  Some consider it the  oldest performance theater on the Indian subcontinent   ...
Read more

What is Underfueling?

-
Image
Underfueling is a form of anxiety and the form of physical as well as mental stress that impacts health and training of a sportsman in a negative way. (From the source of motivrunning.com) Signs of Underfueling Moderate: Constant hunger Fatigue, low energy levels Irritability Intense cravings, or constant focus on food Trouble sleeping Hunger pangs during workouts Gastrointestinal (GI) distress Muscle cramps or weakness Severe: Hypothermia (cold intolerance) Stress fractures Changes in, or complete loss of, a regular menstrual cycle (for women) Significant weight loss The following fueling tips are general, catered to the average population. To understand your individual needs, consult with a sports dietitian. Eat before exercising, especially for high intensity workouts and long runs Eat during exercise if the workout exceeds 60-75 minutes (I generally recommend fueling every 35-40 minutes) Eat after exercising, a recovery meal or snack, followed by another meal or snack within a few ...
Read more

“भारतीय संविधान के 26 ऐतिहासिक सर्वोच्च न्यायालय के प्रमुख निर्णय – अनुच्छेदवार संकलन”

-
Image
1️⃣  चम्पकम दोरैराजन बनाम मद्रास राज्य (1951) अनुच्छेद: 15(1), 29(2) ✅ निर्णय: राज्य की आरक्षण नीति मौलिक अधिकारों का उल्लंघन थी। 📌 महत्त्व: संविधान का प्रथम संशोधन (1951) इसी निर्णय के पश्चात हुआ। 2️⃣ सांकरी प्रसाद बनाम भारत संघ (1951) अनुच्छेद: 13, 368 ✅ निर्णय: संसद को संविधान संशोधन की पूर्ण शक्ति है। 📌 महत्त्व: संशोधन शक्ति की पहली न्यायिक व्याख्या। 3️⃣ केशवन मेनन बनाम बंबई राज्य (1951)अनुच्छेद: 13 ✅ निर्णय: संविधान लागू होने से पहले बने कानूनों पर मौलिक अधिकार लागू नहीं। 📌 महत्त्व: संविधान की समयसीमा स्पष्ट हुई। 4️⃣ बेरूबारी संघ मामला (1960)अनुच्छेद: 3, 368 ✅ निर्णय: भूमि हस्तांतरण के लिए संविधान संशोधन आवश्यक। 📌महत्त्व: भारत की क्षेत्रीय अखंडता की रक्षा। 5️⃣ पश्चिम बंगाल राज्य बनाम भारत संघ (1963)अनुच्छेद: 1, 3, 246 ✅निर्णय: संघीय ढांचे में केंद्र सर्वोच्च। 📌महत्त्व: भारतीय संघ की एकता को बल मिला। 6️⃣ गोलकनाथ बनाम पंजाब राज्य (1967)अनुच्छेद: 13, 368 ✅निर्णय: संसद मौलिक अधिकारों में संशोधन नहीं कर सकती। 📌महत्त्व: संविधान संशोधन शक्ति पर पहली बड़ी ...
Read more