Comparative Analysis of Past Delimitation Exercises & Their Impact on Governance

-
Image
                          Comparative Analysis  Delimitation is the process of redrawing the boundaries of electoral constituencies to ensure fair representation based on population changes . In India, it is conducted by the Delimitation Commission , an independent body established under Article 82 (for Lok Sabha) and Article 170 (for State Assemblies) after every Census . Key Objectives of Delimitation ✔ Equal Representation – Ensures constituencies have uniform voter strength , preventing overrepresentation or underrepresentation.  ✔ Electoral Integrity – Adjusts boundaries to reflect demographic shifts , maintaining fair political representation .  ✔ Reservation Adjustments – Determines SC/ST reserved seats based on population distribution. Historical Timeline of Delimitation in India 📌 1952 – First delimitation based on the  1951 Census .  📌 1963 – Adjustments after state reorga...
Post a Comment

Keisham Meghachandra Singh vs. The Hon’ble Speaker, Manipur Legislative Assembly case (2020)

-

 The Keisham Meghachandra Singh vs. The Hon’ble Speaker, Manipur Legislative Assembly case (2020) is a significant judgment concerning the Anti-Defection Law under the Tenth Schedule of the Indian Constitution. Here are the key points:

Background:

  • Election Context: The case arose after the 2017 Manipur Legislative Assembly elections, which resulted in a hung assembly. The Indian National Congress emerged as the single largest party, but the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) formed the government with the support of other parties and independent MLAs.

Key Issues:

  • Disqualification Petitions: Several petitions were filed seeking the disqualification of MLAs who had defected from the Congress to support the BJP.
  • Speaker’s Delay: The Speaker of the Manipur Legislative Assembly delayed the decision on these disqualification petitions, leading to legal challenges.

Supreme Court Verdict:

  • Timely Decision: The Supreme Court ruled that the Speaker must decide on disqualification petitions within a reasonable time frame, ideally within three months.
  • Judicial Review: The Court emphasized that the Speaker’s decisions are subject to judicial review, ensuring that they are not arbitrary or biased.
  • Independent Tribunal Recommendation: The Court suggested that Parliament consider establishing an independent tribunal, headed by a retired judge, to handle disqualification cases under the Tenth Schedule to avoid potential partisan behavior by the Speaker.

Significance:

  • Strengthening Anti-Defection Law: This judgment reinforced the importance of the Anti-Defection Law in maintaining the integrity of the legislative process.
  • Ensuring Accountability: By setting a time frame for the Speaker’s decisions and allowing judicial review, the Court aimed to ensure greater accountability and transparency in the handling of disqualification petitions.

This case has had a significant impact on the functioning of legislative assemblies and the enforcement of the Anti-Defection Law in India.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is the Sanctity of Parliamentary Debate, Which Lies at the Core of Democratic Decision-Making, Being Compromised?

-
From the historical view where the core of parliamentary debates was based on public welfare, the utilitarianism principle where every individual was very much aware of being responsible for his/her words towards the public, their actions and reactions were under the basic rule. The decorum of parliament was maintained and the politicians were public servants thinking of a collective decision where the core value was to take a step in the public welfare way. Thinking of that era when like-minded people were making decisions for a common vision that was devoted to a well-developed nation as a whole. But if we talk about today's debates they sound to be senseless.   Fighting with the elders, breaking public property, unethical slogans, and quotations to put-down the individual's public and private image is not at all the act of the responsible member of parliament. The core value is dying with the baseless debates where logical thinking and analytical norms are missing. There wa...
Read more

‘India had parliamentary institutions when people of Europe were mere nomads’

-
Image
The quote by  Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, "India had parliamentary institutions when people of Europe were mere nomads,"  is a powerful testament to the ancient civilization's early advancements in governance and societal structures. It speaks volumes about the historical context of India's political systems, which were far more developed than often recognized in the common Eurocentric narrative of history. This essay will delve into the implications of Ambedkar's statement, exploring its historical accuracy, its significance in the context of Indian pride and identity, and its relevance in contemporary discussions about the origins and evolution of democratic institutions. Firstly, various historical records and scholarly research support the assertion that India had parliamentary institutions in ancient times. The 'sabha' and 'samiti' of the Vedic period, for instance, are indicative of consultative assemblies that played a role in governance. These bodie...
Read more

Navigating the Complexities of Cross-Border Insolvency

-
Image
Cross-border , or international insolvency, refers to scenarios where a financially distressed debtor has assets and creditors spread across various jurisdictions . This predominantly concerns multinational corporations rather than individual bankruptcies, presenting unique challenges and considerations. The Jet Airways Case Study A prominent example of cross-border insolvency is the Jet Airways case. The airline found itself entangled in insolvency proceedings in both India and the Netherlands. Initially, the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) in India declared the Dutch proceedings void. However, a cooperation protocol was later established, identifying the Indian proceedings as the main proceedings and the Dutch proceedings as non-main proceedings. This case underscores the intricacies and judicial diplomacy required in cross-border insolvency matters. Key Challenges Jurisdictional Issues : Identifying the primary jurisdiction's court over insolvency proceedings remains a com...
Read more