๐ŸŒŸเคตेเคฆिเค• เคฆीเคชाเคตเคฒी เคถ्เคฐृंเค–เคฒा | Poornima Gontiya

-
๐ŸŒŸ เคตेเคฆिเค• เคฆीเคชाเคตเคฒी เคถ्เคฐृंเค–เคฒा | Poornima Gontiya Author | Creative Thinker | Voice of Inspiration ๐Ÿ”…๐Ÿ”…๐Ÿ”…๐Ÿ”…๐Ÿ”…๐Ÿ”…๐Ÿ”…๐Ÿ”…๐Ÿ”…๐Ÿ”…๐Ÿ”…๐Ÿ”…๐Ÿ”…๐Ÿ”…๐Ÿ”… ๐ŸŒผ 1. เคคเคฎเคธो เคฎा เคœ्เคฏोเคคिเคฐ्เค—เคฎเคฏ เค…เคฐ्เคฅ: เค…ंเคงเค•ाเคฐ เคธे เคช्เคฐเค•ाเคถ เค•ी เค“เคฐ เคšเคฒो। ✨ เคŸैเค—เคฒाเค‡เคจ: เคช्เคฐเค•ाเคถ เคฌเคจो, เค•्เคฏोंเค•ि เคฆीเคช เค†เคค्เคฎा เคธे เคฌเคจเคคा เคนै। ๐ŸŒธ 2. เคธเคฐ्เคตे เคญเคตเคจ्เคคु เคธुเค–िเคจः เค…เคฐ्เคฅ: เคธเคญी เคธुเค–ी เคนों, เคธเคญी เค•ा เค•เคฒ्เคฏाเคฃ เคนो। ๐Ÿ’ซ เคŸैเค—เคฒाเค‡เคจ: เค–ुเคถिเคฏाँ เคฌाँเคŸो, เคคो เคฌ्เคฐเคน्เคฎांเคก เคฎुเคธ्เค•ुเคฐाเคเค—ा। ๐ŸŒบ 3. เคฆीเคชं เคœเคฒเคฏेเคค् เคœ्เคžाเคจเคฆीเคชं เค…เคฐ्เคฅ: เค…เคœ्เคžाเคจ เค•े เคคเคฎ เคฎें เคœ्เคžाเคจ เค•ा เคฆीเคช เคœเคฒाเค“। ๐Ÿช” เคŸैเค—เคฒाเค‡เคจ: เคœो เคœเค—เคฎเค— เคญीเคคเคฐ เค•เคฐे, เคตเคนी เคธเคš्เคšी เคฆीเคชाเคตเคฒी। ๐ŸŒฟ 4. เคœเคฏ เคฆेเคตी เคธเคฐ्เคตเคญूเคคेเคทु เคฒเค•्เคท्เคฎी เคฐूเคชेเคฃ เคธंเคธ्เคฅिเคคा เค…เคฐ्เคฅ: เคฒเค•्เคท्เคฎी เค•ा เคตाเคธ เคนเคฐ เคนृเคฆเคฏ เคฎें เคนै। ๐Ÿ’ฐ เคŸैเค—เคฒाเค‡เคจ: เคธเคฎृเคฆ्เคงि เค•ेเคตเคฒ เคงเคจ เคจเคนीं, เคฎเคจ เค•ी เคคृเคช्เคคि เคนै। ๐ŸŒผ 5. เฅ เคถुเคญं เค•เคฐोเคคि เค•เคฒ्เคฏाเคฃเคฎ् เค…เคฐ्เคฅ: เคถुเคญเคคा เค”เคฐ เค•เคฒ्เคฏाเคฃ เค•ा เคช्เคฐเค•ाเคถ เคซैเคฒाเค“। ✨ เคŸैเค—เคฒाเค‡เคจ: เคนเคฐ เคฆीเคช เคฎें เค›ुเคชा เคนै เคˆเคถ्เคตเคฐ เค•ा เค†เคถीเคท। ๐ŸŒธ 6. เค…เคธเคคो เคฎा เคธเคฆ्เค—เคฎเคฏ เค…เคฐ्เคฅ: เค…เคธเคค्เคฏ เคธे เคธเคค्เคฏ เค•ी เค“เคฐ เคšเคฒो। ๐Ÿชท เคŸैเค—เคฒाเค‡เคจ: เคธเคค्เคฏ เค•ी เคฒौ เค•เคญी เคฎंเคฆ เคจเคนीं เคนोเคคी। ๐ŸŒฟ 7. เค‹เคคेเคจ เคธเคค्เคฏं เคคिเคท्เค เคคि เค…เคฐ्เคฅ: เคธเคค्เคฏ เคนी เคœीเคตเคจ เค•ी เคจींเคต เคนै। ๐Ÿ’ซ เคŸैเค—เคฒाเค‡เคจ: เคฆीเคช เคธเคค्เคฏ เค•ा, เคœीเคตเคจ เคœ्เคฏोเคคिเคฐ्เคฎเคฏ। ๐ŸŒบ 8. เคถुเคญं เค…เคธ्เคคु เคธเคฐ्เคตเคœเคจाเคฏ เค…เคฐ्เคฅ: เคธเคฌเค•े เคฒिเค เคฎंเค—เคฒ เค•ी เค•ाเคฎเคจा। ✨ เคŸैเค—เคฒाเค‡เคจ: เคœो เคธเคฌเค•ा เคธोเคšเคคा เคนै, เคต...
Post a Comment

The Lily Thomas Case: A Turning Point for Indian Democracy

-

 The Lily Thomas Case: A Turning Point for Indian Democracy


The Lily Thomas case stands as a testament to the power of judicial review and the role of the judiciary in upholding the principles of democracy. The case, spearheaded by the indomitable spirit of Lily Thomas, an activist lawyer, and the NGO Lok Prahari, brought to light the critical issue of criminalization in politics. It challenged the constitutional validity of Section 8(4) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, which allowed convicted legislators to retain their seats while an appeal was pending.


The Supreme Court's landmark judgment on July 10, 2013, marked a significant shift in the legislative landscape of India. By striking down Section 8(4), the court ensured that the sanctity of the legislative bodies was preserved. The immediate disqualification of convicted MPs and MLAs sent a clear message: criminality has no place in the halls of democracy.


The implications of this judgment were far-reaching. It not only curbed the misuse of legal loopholes by convicted legislators but also restored public faith in the democratic process. The verdict was a clarion call for transparency and accountability, compelling political parties to be more circumspect in their candidate selection.


The case also underscored the importance of Public Interest Litigations (PILs) in the Indian legal system. It demonstrated how the judiciary could become an instrument of social change, empowering citizens to challenge unjust laws and practices.


The Lily Thomas case is a reminder that the rule of law is supreme, and even elected representatives are not above it. It is a milestone in India's journey towards a more ethical and accountable governance system, ensuring that the mantle of leadership is borne by individuals of integrity.


As we reflect on the impact of this case, it is crucial to recognize the ongoing efforts to cleanse the politics of criminal elements. The judgment has set a precedent, but the journey is far from over. It is up to the citizens, the judiciary, and the political establishment to carry forward the legacy of this case, nurturing a democratic ethos that values moral rectitude as much as it does electoral success.


In conclusion, the Lily Thomas case is not just a legal victory; it is a beacon of hope for all who aspire to a cleaner, more dignified political arena. It reaffirms our belief in the judiciary's role as the guardian of constitutional values and the protector of democratic ideals. The case will continue to inspire future generations to uphold the tenets of justice and equality, ensuring that the spirit of democracy remains inviolable.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is the Sanctity of Parliamentary Debate, Which Lies at the Core of Democratic Decision-Making, Being Compromised?

-
From the historical view where the core of parliamentary debates was based on public welfare, the utilitarianism principle where every individual was very much aware of being responsible for his/her words towards the public, their actions and reactions were under the basic rule. The decorum of parliament was maintained and the politicians were public servants thinking of a collective decision where the core value was to take a step in the public welfare way. Thinking of that era when like-minded people were making decisions for a common vision that was devoted to a well-developed nation as a whole. But if we talk about today's debates they sound to be senseless.   Fighting with the elders, breaking public property, unethical slogans, and quotations to put-down the individual's public and private image is not at all the act of the responsible member of parliament. The core value is dying with the baseless debates where logical thinking and analytical norms are missing. There wa...
Read more

The Jogimara and Sitabenga Caves

-
Image
   image source- PURATATTVA The   Jogimara and Sitabenga Caves , also known as the   Sitabenga Cave   or   Jogimara Cave , are ancient cave monuments nestled in the north side of the   Ramgarh hills   in Puta village,   Chhattisgarh, India .   These remarkable caves date back to approximately the  3rd-century BCE to 1st-century BCE  and hold significant historical and artistic value  1 . Here are some fascinating details about these caves: Non-Religious Inscriptions and Ancient Frescoes : The Jogimara and Sitabenga Caves are notable for their  non-religious inscriptions  in  Brahmi script  and  Magadhi language . They also feature  one of the oldest colored frescoes in Asia . Scholars debate whether the Sitabenga cave was an ancient performance theater or a resting place along an ancient trade route.  Some consider it the  oldest performance theater on the Indian subcontinent   ...
Read more

๐Ÿšจ Fight against cyber bullying ๐Ÿšจ

-
Image
๐ŸŒ Awareness Post: Protect Yourself from Mental Harassment and Cyber Crime in 2024 ๐Ÿšจ ⚜️In today's digital era people are more present in the virtual world rather than the real world. The digital way has become the medium of taking out your anger, frustration,guilt but sometimes some unawared idiotic personalities take these things as forgranted which leads to someone's peace of mind imbalance and in some worst cases it comes to life and death.              It is acceptable worldwide that online platforms have become a crucial part of our daily lives, but they also bring challenges like mental harassment, cybercrime, and abusive language. ๐Ÿšจ To combat these challenges, India’s 2024 legal amendments strengthen the protection of individuals online by addressing cyber harassment, stalking, and abusive behavior with stricter laws. ๐ŸšจKey Highlights of Indian Laws:๐Ÿšจ ๐Ÿ“Œ Criminal Intimidation (Section 503 IPC): Penalizes threats ...
Read more