Dr. D.C. Wadhwa & Ors. vs. State of Bihar & Ors. case of 1986

-
 The Dr. D.C. Wadhwa & Ors. vs. State of Bihar & Ors. case of 1986 is a cornerstone in the Indian judicial history, highlighting the delicate balance of power between the executive and legislative branches of government . The case stemmed from a practice that had become routine for the Bihar government: the re-promulgation of ordinances without legislative approval, a process that Dr. D.C. Wadhwa, an economics professor, found to be a subversion of democratic principles . The Supreme Court's decision in this case was a resounding affirmation of constitutional law and its supremacy over executive convenience. By declaring the practice of re-promulgating ordinances without legislative consent as unconstitutional, the court reinforced the necessity of legislative scrutiny and the impermanence of ordinances, which are meant to be emergency measures, not a backdoor for enacting laws. This landmark judgment serves as a reminder of the importance of checks and balances within
Post a Comment

AUTONOMOUS DISTRICT COUNCIL

-

 

image source- google

The Sixth Schedule of the Constitution of India allows for the formation of autonomous administrative divisions that have been granted autonomy within their respective states. These autonomous district councils operate in various regions, primarily in North East India, with a few exceptions in Ladakh and West Bengal.

Here are some key points about these autonomous district councils:

  1. Formation and Purpose:

    • Autonomous district councils are established to ensure self-governance and empowerment within specific regions.
    • Most of these councils operate under the Sixth Schedule of the Constitution.
    • They have legislative and executive powers in various areas, allowing them to address local needs and priorities.

  2. Powers and Competencies:

    • Land Management: Autonomous district councils can make laws related to land management.
    • Forest Management: They have authority over forest resources.
    • Water Resources: Control and regulation of water resources.
    • Agriculture and Cultivation: Policies related to agriculture.
    • Formation of Village Councils: Establishing local governance structures.
    • Public Health and Sanitation: Ensuring community well-being.
    • Village and Town Level Policing: Local law enforcement.
    • Appointment of Traditional Chiefs and Headmen: Recognizing traditional leadership.
    • Inheritance of Property, Marriage and Divorce, and Social Customs.
    • Money Lending and Trading, Mining and Minerals.
    • Judicial Powers: Setting up courts for cases involving Scheduled Tribes.
    • Taxation and Revenue: Levying taxes on various aspects such as land, animals, vehicles, and more.

  3. List of Autonomous Administrative Divisions:

    • The following autonomous district councils operate under the Sixth Schedule:
      • Bodoland Territorial Council (Assam)
      • North Cachar Hills Autonomous Council (Assam)
      • Karbi Anglong Autonomous Council (Assam)
      • Tiwa Autonomous Council (Assam)
      • Mising Autonomous Council (Assam)
      • Rabha Hasong Autonomous Council (Assam)
      • Sonowal Kachari Autonomous Council (Assam)
      • Thengal Kachari Autonomous Council (Assam)
      • Garo Hills Autonomous District Council (Meghalaya)
      • Jaintia Hills Autonomous District Council (Meghalaya)
      • Khasi Hills Autonomous District Council (Meghalaya)
      • Dima Hasao Autonomous District Council (Assam)

These autonomous district councils play a vital role in local governance, preserving cultural heritage, and addressing community-specific needs. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

šŸŒŸPrivilege CommitteešŸŒŸ

-
šŸ“ŒAbout Committee of Privileges: ✍️It is a Standing Committee. ✍️ It came into being on 7 January 2013 as one half of the replacements for the Committee on Standards and Privileges. ✍️The functions of this committee are "Semi-judicial"  ✍️ Aimed to examine cases if breach of priviledges of the House and it's mrmbers and recommends appropriate action. šŸ“ŒMembers in Rajya Sabha - 10, nominated by Chairman . šŸ“Œ Members in Lok-Sabha - 15  nominated by the Speaker . ✍️In the Rajya Sabha, the deputy chairperson heads the committee of privileges. šŸŒŸPowers and Functions: ✍️The committee examines every question involving a breach of privilege of the House or of the members or of any Committee thereof referred to it by the House or by the Speaker/Chairman.  ✍️It also determines with reference to the facts of each case whether a breach of privilege is involved and makes suitable recommendations in its report. ✍️In Rajya - Sabha When a question of privilege is referred to the Committe
Read more

‘India had parliamentary institutions when people of Europe were mere nomads’

-
Image
The quote by  Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, "India had parliamentary institutions when people of Europe were mere nomads,"  is a powerful testament to the ancient civilization's early advancements in governance and societal structures. It speaks volumes about the historical context of India's political systems, which were far more developed than often recognized in the common Eurocentric narrative of history. This essay will delve into the implications of Ambedkar's statement, exploring its historical accuracy, its significance in the context of Indian pride and identity, and its relevance in contemporary discussions about the origins and evolution of democratic institutions. Firstly, various historical records and scholarly research support the assertion that India had parliamentary institutions in ancient times. The 'sabha' and 'samiti' of the Vedic period, for instance, are indicative of consultative assemblies that played a role in governance. These bodie
Read more

Dr. D.C. Wadhwa & Ors. vs. State of Bihar & Ors. case of 1986

-
 The Dr. D.C. Wadhwa & Ors. vs. State of Bihar & Ors. case of 1986 is a cornerstone in the Indian judicial history, highlighting the delicate balance of power between the executive and legislative branches of government . The case stemmed from a practice that had become routine for the Bihar government: the re-promulgation of ordinances without legislative approval, a process that Dr. D.C. Wadhwa, an economics professor, found to be a subversion of democratic principles . The Supreme Court's decision in this case was a resounding affirmation of constitutional law and its supremacy over executive convenience. By declaring the practice of re-promulgating ordinances without legislative consent as unconstitutional, the court reinforced the necessity of legislative scrutiny and the impermanence of ordinances, which are meant to be emergency measures, not a backdoor for enacting laws. This landmark judgment serves as a reminder of the importance of checks and balances within
Read more