Comparative Analysis of Past Delimitation Exercises & Their Impact on Governance

-
Image
                          Comparative Analysis  Delimitation is the process of redrawing the boundaries of electoral constituencies to ensure fair representation based on population changes . In India, it is conducted by the Delimitation Commission , an independent body established under Article 82 (for Lok Sabha) and Article 170 (for State Assemblies) after every Census . Key Objectives of Delimitation ✔ Equal Representation – Ensures constituencies have uniform voter strength , preventing overrepresentation or underrepresentation.  ✔ Electoral Integrity – Adjusts boundaries to reflect demographic shifts , maintaining fair political representation .  ✔ Reservation Adjustments – Determines SC/ST reserved seats based on population distribution. Historical Timeline of Delimitation in India 📌 1952 – First delimitation based on the  1951 Census .  📌 1963 – Adjustments after state reorga...
Post a Comment

SPECIAL PROVISION FOR SOME STATE PROVIDED UNDER ARTICLE 371-371-J

-

 

image source - legalswamp.in.

Let’s explore the special provisions provided under Article 371 of the Indian Constitution. These provisions are aimed at addressing specific regional needs, cultural interests, and developmental challenges in certain states. Here are some key points related to Article 371:

  1. Article 371:

    • Overview: Articles 369 to 392 appear in Part XXI of the Constitution, titled “Temporary, Transitional, and Special Provisions.”
    • Special Provisions: Article 371 includes special provisions for eleven states, including six states in the Northeast region.
    • Objective: These provisions aim to meet the aspirations of people in backward regions, protect tribal interests, and address law and order situations.
    • Incorporation: Articles 371A through 371J were incorporated through subsequent amendments after the Constitution’s commencement in 1950.

  2. Specific Provisions:

    • Maharashtra and Gujarat (Article 371):
      • The Governor has a “special responsibility” to:
        • Establish separate development boards for Vidarbha, Marathwada, and the rest of Maharashtra.
        • Establish separate development boards for Saurashtra, Kutch, and the rest of Gujarat.
        • Ensure equitable allocation of funds for developmental expenditure in these areas.
        • Provide adequate facilities for technical education, vocational training, and employment opportunities.
    • Nagaland (Article 371A):
      • Acts of Parliament related to Naga religion, social practices, customary law, and land ownership do not apply unless the State Legislative Assembly decides otherwise.
    • Assam (Article 371B):
      • The President may provide for the constitution and functions of a committee of elected members from the state’s tribal areas.
    • Manipur (Article 371C):
      • The President may constitute a committee of elected members from the hill areas in the Assembly.
    • Andhra Pradesh and Telangana (Article 371D):
      • The President ensures equitable opportunities and facilities in public employment and education for people from different parts of the state.

  3. Other States with Article 371 Provisions:

    • Goa (Article 371I): No specific provisions.
    • Karnataka (Article 371J):
      • Provides special status to six backward districts of the Hyderabad-Karnataka region.
      • Requires the establishment of a separate development board for this region.
      • Ensures local reservation in education and government jobs.

These provisions recognize the unique needs of different regions and contribute to balanced development and cultural preservation. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is the Sanctity of Parliamentary Debate, Which Lies at the Core of Democratic Decision-Making, Being Compromised?

-
From the historical view where the core of parliamentary debates was based on public welfare, the utilitarianism principle where every individual was very much aware of being responsible for his/her words towards the public, their actions and reactions were under the basic rule. The decorum of parliament was maintained and the politicians were public servants thinking of a collective decision where the core value was to take a step in the public welfare way. Thinking of that era when like-minded people were making decisions for a common vision that was devoted to a well-developed nation as a whole. But if we talk about today's debates they sound to be senseless.   Fighting with the elders, breaking public property, unethical slogans, and quotations to put-down the individual's public and private image is not at all the act of the responsible member of parliament. The core value is dying with the baseless debates where logical thinking and analytical norms are missing. There wa...
Read more

‘India had parliamentary institutions when people of Europe were mere nomads’

-
Image
The quote by  Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, "India had parliamentary institutions when people of Europe were mere nomads,"  is a powerful testament to the ancient civilization's early advancements in governance and societal structures. It speaks volumes about the historical context of India's political systems, which were far more developed than often recognized in the common Eurocentric narrative of history. This essay will delve into the implications of Ambedkar's statement, exploring its historical accuracy, its significance in the context of Indian pride and identity, and its relevance in contemporary discussions about the origins and evolution of democratic institutions. Firstly, various historical records and scholarly research support the assertion that India had parliamentary institutions in ancient times. The 'sabha' and 'samiti' of the Vedic period, for instance, are indicative of consultative assemblies that played a role in governance. These bodie...
Read more

Navigating the Complexities of Cross-Border Insolvency

-
Image
Cross-border , or international insolvency, refers to scenarios where a financially distressed debtor has assets and creditors spread across various jurisdictions . This predominantly concerns multinational corporations rather than individual bankruptcies, presenting unique challenges and considerations. The Jet Airways Case Study A prominent example of cross-border insolvency is the Jet Airways case. The airline found itself entangled in insolvency proceedings in both India and the Netherlands. Initially, the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) in India declared the Dutch proceedings void. However, a cooperation protocol was later established, identifying the Indian proceedings as the main proceedings and the Dutch proceedings as non-main proceedings. This case underscores the intricacies and judicial diplomacy required in cross-border insolvency matters. Key Challenges Jurisdictional Issues : Identifying the primary jurisdiction's court over insolvency proceedings remains a com...
Read more