The Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA)

-
The Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) , introduced in 2005 by the Ministry of Rural Development , is one of the world's largest work guarantee programs.  It aims to strengthen livelihood security in rural areas by providing 100 days of assured wage employment each year to adult members of rural households willing to engage in unskilled manual labor. This initiative plays a vital role in promoting economic stability, empowering communities, and fostering sustainable development across India's rural landscape. The Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) stands as a monumental testament to India's commitment to social welfare and rural empowerment. Enacted in 2005, this groundbreaking initiative has evolved into one of the most significant pillars of support for rural populations across the country. Imagine a program that guarantees 100 days of wage employment annually to adult members of rural households—this is not jus...
Post a Comment

🚩Khalasthani Insurgencies🚩

-

🚩Khalasthani Insurgencies🚩

👉The radical separatists spearheaded a bloody campaign to carve out an independent, theocratic Sikh state known as Khalistan (Land of the Pure) in Punjab and other parts of Northern India.
👉The increased insurgencies in canada of sikh community particularly the "so called" pro -Khalisthani Militants are creating the vandalism sistuations to obligate the indian diasphora to become a part of a separatist.
👉Ultimately their increased violations towards the citizens going against the millitants are creating the serious situations to the livelyhood of Indian Diasphora. The common people are becoming their prime victims of violence and insurgencies.

✴️Who is responsible for this situation.
👉The Millitants of Pro-khalisthanis who are funded for their terror attacts are responsible for these insurgencies which is creating the dreadful situation and also destroying the communal harmony of the common people.

✴️Security measures.

👉Rather than complaining or calling out to the foreign govrenment for their failures the Indian government should take an impactful action to curb these situations. Because the country may be different but the people are ours. the Vast Indian diasphora still believes in the Indian govetnment and it is our duty to keep their trust and confidence alive by taking the responsibility of Indian diplomatic mission.

👉The security of people with respect to their sovereign rights of their country and public law and order should be mainted.

✴️How it will be useful fir India to take part effectively in curbing these situations.
👉 Socially -The NRIs ,Indian Diasphora are the bridge builder between their home-land and the country they adopted.
👉Politically-The Indian diaspora is not just a part of India’s soft power, but a fully transferable political vote bank as well.
👉Economically-Remittances sent by the Indian diaspora have positive systemic effects on the Balance of Payments (BOP), which help to bridge a wider trade deficit.
🔱Keeping all these benifits aside
"This extremism deserves universal condemnation and a united response.”

🔱Indian government in cunsultation with the Canadian government  should incorporate effective laws and policies that makes the West to create a secure,peacefull and perfect environmet . In practicality, conferring equal rights to the diaspora population will only serve as a win-win situation.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is the Sanctity of Parliamentary Debate, Which Lies at the Core of Democratic Decision-Making, Being Compromised?

-
From the historical view where the core of parliamentary debates was based on public welfare, the utilitarianism principle where every individual was very much aware of being responsible for his/her words towards the public, their actions and reactions were under the basic rule. The decorum of parliament was maintained and the politicians were public servants thinking of a collective decision where the core value was to take a step in the public welfare way. Thinking of that era when like-minded people were making decisions for a common vision that was devoted to a well-developed nation as a whole. But if we talk about today's debates they sound to be senseless.   Fighting with the elders, breaking public property, unethical slogans, and quotations to put-down the individual's public and private image is not at all the act of the responsible member of parliament. The core value is dying with the baseless debates where logical thinking and analytical norms are missing. There wa...
Read more

‘India had parliamentary institutions when people of Europe were mere nomads’

-
Image
The quote by  Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, "India had parliamentary institutions when people of Europe were mere nomads,"  is a powerful testament to the ancient civilization's early advancements in governance and societal structures. It speaks volumes about the historical context of India's political systems, which were far more developed than often recognized in the common Eurocentric narrative of history. This essay will delve into the implications of Ambedkar's statement, exploring its historical accuracy, its significance in the context of Indian pride and identity, and its relevance in contemporary discussions about the origins and evolution of democratic institutions. Firstly, various historical records and scholarly research support the assertion that India had parliamentary institutions in ancient times. The 'sabha' and 'samiti' of the Vedic period, for instance, are indicative of consultative assemblies that played a role in governance. These bodie...
Read more

Dr. D.C. Wadhwa & Ors. vs. State of Bihar & Ors. case of 1986

-
 The Dr. D.C. Wadhwa & Ors. vs. State of Bihar & Ors. case of 1986 is a cornerstone in the Indian judicial history, highlighting the delicate balance of power between the executive and legislative branches of government . The case stemmed from a practice that had become routine for the Bihar government: the re-promulgation of ordinances without legislative approval, a process that Dr. D.C. Wadhwa, an economics professor, found to be a subversion of democratic principles . The Supreme Court's decision in this case was a resounding affirmation of constitutional law and its supremacy over executive convenience. By declaring the practice of re-promulgating ordinances without legislative consent as unconstitutional, the court reinforced the necessity of legislative scrutiny and the impermanence of ordinances, which are meant to be emergency measures, not a backdoor for enacting laws. This landmark judgment serves as a reminder of the importance of checks and balances within ...
Read more